Friley v. International Playtex, Inc., 82-4103-CV-C-5.
| Decision Date | 13 August 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-4103-CV-C-5.,82-4103-CV-C-5. |
| Citation | 604 F. Supp. 126 |
| Parties | Sandra FRILEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. INTERNATIONAL PLAYTEX, INC., Defendant. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Western District of Missouri |
Roger C. Brown, Jefferson City, Mo., for plaintiffs.
Thomas O. Baker, Thomas N. Sterchi, Kansas City, Mo., for defendant.
Before entering judgment in this strict products liability/negligence case, the Court must consider whether the jury's punitive damage award must be reduced by the plaintiff's percentage of fault. Missouri law, which has only recently adopted a system of comparative fault, has not addressed this issue. Nevertheless, Missouri law is quite clear that punitive damage awards are intended not to compensate the plaintiff, but to punish the defendant and to deter the defendant and others from similar conduct. See MAI 10.02 (1983 Revision), 10.04 (1983 Revision). Consequently, the Court is of the opinion that the punitive damage award in this case should not be reduced by the plaintiff's percentage of fault because punitive damages are designed to benefit and protect society as a whole. The extent of the particular plaintiff's fault is simply irrelevant. This view is in accord with the overwhelming weight of authority. See, e.g., Campbell v. Van Roekel, 347 N.W.2d 406 (Iowa 1984); Shahrokhfar v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 634 P.2d 653 (Mont.1981); Amoco Pipeline Co. v. Montgomery, 487 F.Supp. 1268 (W.D.Okla.1980).
Of course, the jury's award of $6,500.00 in compensatory damages must be reduced by the plaintiff's percentage of fault. Gustafson v. Benda, 661 S.W.2d 11 (Mo.1983) (en banc). The jury found that the plaintiff was 49% at fault. Consequently, the plaintiff will be entitled to recover 51% of her compensatory damages.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the punitive damage award of $50,000.00 shall not be reduced by the plaintiff's percentage of fault. It is further
ORDERED that the compensatory damage award shall be reduced to $3,315.00.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ziarko v. Soo Line R. Co.
...1056 (applying Mississippi law). Missouri: Menaugh v. Resler Optometry, Inc. (Mo.1990), 799 S.W.2d 71; Friley v. International Playtex, Inc. (W.D. Mo.1984), 604 F.Supp. 126 (applying Missouri law). Montana: Martel v. Montana Power Co. (1988), 231 Mont. 96, 752 P.2d 140; Shahrokhfar v. State......
-
Lira v. Davis
...Plaintiff's Comparative Negligence in Reducing Punitive Damages Recoverable, 27 A.L.R.4th 318 (1984). See also Friley v. International Playtex, Inc., 604 F.Supp. 126 (W.D.Mo.1984); Amoco Pipeline Co. v. Montgomery, 487 F.Supp. 1268, 1273 (W.D.Okla.1980); Tampa Electric Co. v. Stone & Webste......
-
Gearhart v. Uniden Corp. of America
...principles in a strict-liability case. We arrive at this conclusion, also reached by the District Court in Friley v. Inter'l Playtex, Inc., 604 F.Supp. 126 (W.D.Mo.1984), ] through our reading of Gustafson. The issue before the Missouri Supreme Court in Gustafson was only the vitality of th......
-
Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.
...is whether Larry Hale's fault should diminish the jury's punitive damage award of $1,500,000.00. The Court previously addressed this issue in Friley, and held that punitive damages should not be reduced by the plaintiff's percentage of fault. 604 F.Supp. at Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED......