FRT 2011-1 Trust v. Ehealthscreen, LLC
Decision Date | 19 April 2016 |
Docket Number | CV 213-107 |
Parties | FRT 2011-1 TRUST, Plaintiff, v. eHEALTHSCREEN, LLC; MACK W. BRYSON; and JANE O. BRYSON, Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Georgia |
This matter comes before the Court on several fully briefed dispositive motions: Defendant eHealthscreen, LLC's ("eHealthscreen") Motion for Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff FRT 2011-1 Trust ("Plaintiff") (dkt. no. 57); Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Against eHealthscreen (dkt. no. 65); eHealthscreen's Motion for Summary Judgment on Crossclaims and for Partial Summary Judgment on Counterclaims to Crossclaims (dkt. no. 55); and Defendants Mack W. Bryson ("Mack Bryson") and Jane 0. Bryson's (collectively, the "Brysons") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Crossclaims and Counterclaims (dkt. no. 59).
For the reasons that follow, eHealthscreen's Motion for Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff (dkt. no. 57) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's cross-Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against this Defendant (dkt. no. 65) is DENIED. Additionally, eHealthscreen's Motion seeking summary judgment on the Brysons' crossclaims and partial summary judgment on its counterclaims (dkt. no. 55) is GRANTED. The Brysons' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Crossclaims and Counterclaims (dkt. no. 59) is thus DENIED.1
BACKGROUND2
Plaintiff is a Delaware statutory trust that claims to have a security interest in the Brysons' real property (the "Property") and seeks to foreclose upon the same. See eHealthscreen's SMF 2, ¶¶ 43-44; Pl.'s SMF, ¶¶ 61-62. TheBrysons own and currently reside on the Property, which is located in Waverly, Georgia. Brysons' SMF, ¶¶ 1-2. eHealthscreen is a Florida limited liability company that also purports to be a secured creditor of the Brysons and has attempted to exercise its alleged rights in the subject Property. eHealthscreen's SMF 1, ¶¶ 17-18, 30; Brysons' SMF, ¶ 3; Pl.'s SMF, ¶ 6.
In May 2005, HSDM was formed and acquired Mack Bryson's company, Currahee Health Benefits Solutions, Inc. Dkt. No. 71, Ex. A (Affidavit of Mack Bryson, hereinafter "Mack Bryson Aff."), ¶ 2. Mack Bryson became an equity partner with a twenty percent share in HSDM and also agreed to serve as its Chief Executive Officer. eHealthscreen's SMF 1, ¶ 1; Brysons' SMF, ¶ 4. Aside from Mack Bryson, the equity members of HSDM included Anthony Campbell ("Campbell"), J. Melvin Deese ("Deese"), William McArthur ("McArthur"), and Charles Hendrix ("Hendrix"). Brysons' SMF, ¶ 3; Pl.'s SMF, ¶ 7.
A letter dated May 6, 2005, sets forth the agreed-upon terms of Mack Bryson's relationship with HSDM. eHealthscreen's SMF 1, ¶ 2. The letter states, in relevant part:
Dkt. No. 55, Ex. A.
Upon Mack Bryson becoming an equity member, HSDM began making the $25,000 monthly payment to him as an "advance of distributions in the form of a salary," as well as the other payments on his behalf as stipulated in paragraphs eleven, twelve, and thirteen. eHealthscreen's SMF 1, ¶¶ 6-7. HSDM took tax deductions for these payments, and state and federal taxes were withheld from Mack Bryson's monthly paychecks. Mack Bryson Aff., ¶ 8.
The four equity members of HSDM other than Mack Bryson—namely, Campbell, Deese, McArthur, and Hendrix—formed and became partners of eHealthscreen in September 2006. Brysons' SMF, ¶ 4; Pl.'s SMF, ¶ 8; Mack Bryson Aff., ¶¶ 6, 12. Mack Bryson was not a member of eHealthscreen. Brysons' SMF, ¶ 4; Pl.'s SMF, ¶ 8; Mack Bryson Aff., ¶ 6. HSDM and eHealthscreen were organized and operated as entirely separate and distinct legal entities. Brysons' SMF, ¶ 11. eHealthscreen nevertheless maintains that it and HSDM operated as a joint venture, because it existed only to provide services to HSDM. Dkt. No. 75-1, ¶ 11.
Hendrix served as President of eHealthscreen and oversaw most of its day-to-day operations. Pl.'s SMF, ¶ 10. Campbell was Vice Chairman of eHealthscreen and, as a licensed attorney, also handled at least some of the company's legal and other matters. Id. at ¶ 9. For example, according to McArthur, Campbell was the only member who wrote documents or letters on behalf of eHealthscreen. Id. at ¶ 56. As to some matters, the other members needed to review and agree with Campbell's work prior to him taking action; however, under certain circumstances, the other members allowed Campbell to act on behalf of eHealthscreen without their express, written authority. Id. at ¶¶ 9, 48.
In July and September 2006, the Brysons refinanced the Property with First Chatham Bank ("FCB") and, in doing so, executed two deeds to secure debt granting liens on the Property to FCB. eHealthscreen's SMF 2, ¶¶ 2-3; Pl.'s SMF, ¶¶ 3-4.
In November 2006, two members of HSDM informed Mack Bryson that he needed to execute a secured promissory note agreeing to pay eHealthscreen certain sums of money or else his relationship with HSDM would be severed. eHealthscreen's SMF 1, ¶¶ 10, 15-16. According to the HSDM members, they did so because HSDM had been making steady "advance[s] of distributions in the form of a salary" to Mack Bryson and other payments on his behalf as contemplated in the May 6, 2005, letter, while "no distributions were ever made to the members of HSDM." Id. at ¶¶ 3, 6-9. Thus, the HSDM members required that Mack Bryson promise to pay eHealthscreen these amounts, as well as any future amounts, because HSDM ultimately had not made any equity member distributions from which these amounts could be deducted. Id. at ¶¶ 10-12.
The Promissory Note, dated November 27, 2006, states, in pertinent part, as follows:
Dkt. No. 54-2, pp. 1-2. The attached Security Deed conveys an interest in the Brysons' Property to eHealthscreen as security for Mack Bryson's payment on the Promissory Note. Id. at pp. 6, 8.
Mack Bryson signed the Promissory Note, and he and his wife signed the Security Deed, in favor of eHealthscreen. eHealthscreen's SMF 1, ¶¶...
To continue reading
Request your trial