Fry v. Bidwell

Decision Date30 September 1874
Citation74 Ill. 381,1874 WL 9145
PartiesCONRAD J. FRYv.ORLANDO B. BIDWELL.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Stephenson county.

Mr. SMITH D. ATKIN, for the appellant.

Messrs. BARTON & BARNUM, for the appellee.

Mr. JUSTICE SHELDON delivered the opinion of the Court:

This is an appeal from an order of confirmation of a guardian's sale of real estate, where appellant was the purchaser.

The sole question is, whether the notice given by the guardian of his intended application for leave to sell the real estate, was published for a sufficient length of time. The requirement of the statute is this: “Notice of such application shall be given to all persons concerned, by publication in some newspaper published in the county where the application is made, at least once each week for three successive weeks, or by setting up written or printed notices in three of the most public places in the county, at least three weeks before the session of the court at which such application shall be made.”

The notice given by the guardian was, by publication in the Freeport Journal, a weekly newspaper, stating that on the third Monday of November, A. D. 1872, he would apply, etc.

The notice, as appears by the certificate of the publisher of the paper, was published in every issue of the paper, commencing October 23, 1872, and ending November 13, 1872. It was then published October 23d and 30th, and November 6th and 13th. The court sitting on the third Monday of November, convened on the 18th of that month.

Appellant's counsel contends, that if the notice is given by publication in a newspaper, the three successive weeks of such publication must be completed, at least three weeks before the session of the court at which the application is to be made; that is, that three weeks must intervene the third publication and the session of the court.

We look upon this as a forced and unnatural construction of the language of the act.

Two ways are provided of giving the notice:

First. It may be given by publishing in some newspaper, etc., “at least once each week for three successive weeks.”

Second. It may be given by setting up written or printed notices, etc., “at least three weeks before the session of the court,” etc.

The plain reading of the section seems to us to be, that all that is required where the notice is by publication is, that it should be at least once each week for three successive weeks; and that the clause,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Ballard v. Hunter
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 11, 1905
    ...rendered upon evidence. 63 Ark. 513; 47 Minn. 326; 164 Ill. 531; 55 Ark. 37. And was not prematurely rendered. 10 Mass. 105; 50 Ill. 179; 74 Ill. 381. Randolph & Randolph and W. S. & F. L. McCain, for appellants in Mrs. Josephine Ballard was not a party to the tax suit, and is entitled to r......
  • Johnson v. Hunter
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Arkansas
    • January 11, 1904
    ...was the required time before rendition of the decree or judgment. Colman v. Anderson, 10 Mass. 105; Harper v. Ely, 56 Ill. 179; Fry v. Bidwell, 74 Ill. 381. follows from what has been said that the decrees under which defendants claim title are valid decrees, and that complainants are entit......
  • The National Surety Co. v. W. H. Holliday Co.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • February 10, 1931
    ...on its face that the notice of claim was served prematurely. Dickerson v. Flanagan, 136 S.W. 854. The defect is jurisdictional. Fry v. Bidwell, 74 Ill. 381; State v. Miller, 126 So. 422; Corp. v. Co., 168 N.E. 865; Ricketts v. Hyde Park, 85 Ill. 110, 20 R. C. L. 343; Hay v. Hudson, 224 P. 8......
  • State ex rel. Coleman v. Blair
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 14, 1912
    ... ... proceedings are had, it is sufficient if the last insertion ... of the notice shall occur before such proceedings are had ... [ German Bank v. Stumpf, 73 Mo. 311; Drainage ... District v. Campbell, 154 Mo. 151, 55 S.W. 276; ... Harper v. Ely, 56 Ill. 179; Fry v. Bidwell, ... 74 Ill. 381.] ...           [245 ... Mo. 691] Defendant's resourceful counsel has called our ... attention to many statutes of Missouri prescribing how ... service may be had by publication; but he omits Sec. 152, R ... S. 1909, providing for publication of notice to creditors ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT