Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. State.
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Brown |
| Citation | Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. State., 87 S.W. 336, 99 Tex. 34, 12 Tex. Ct. Rep. 1002 (Tex. 1905) |
| Decision Date | 18 May 1905 |
| Parties | FT. WORTH & D. C. RY. CO. et al. v. STATE. |
Stanley, Spoonts & Thompson, Andrews, Ball & Streetman, and J. D. Guinn, for appellants. C. K. Bell, Jno. W. Brady, Allen & Hart, and D. A. McFall, for appellee.
This is a certified question from the Court of Civil Appeals of the Third Supreme Judicial District. The statement and questions are as follows:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
14 cases
-
State v. Duluth Board of Trade
... ... [107 Minn. 540] "the free pursuit of any business ... authorized or permitted by law" was not restricted. The ... contract in no way interfered with the rights of any other ... sleeping car company, if any existed, to build and furnish ... its cars to railway companies. Ft. Worth v. State, ... 99 Tex. 34, 87 S.W. 336, 70 L.R.A. 950 ... An ... agreement between a carrier and an association of citizens ... for special rates on excursion tickets does not violate ... either the state or federal anti-trust statutes. Lytle v ... Galveston, 100 Tex ... ...
-
State v. Fairbanks-Morse & Co.
...citing in support, Lewis v. Weatherford, M. W. & N. W. Railway Co., 36 Tex.Civ.App. 48, 81 S.W. 111 and Fort Worth and D. C. Ry. Co. v. State, 99 Tex. 34, 87 S.W. 336, 70 L.R.A. 950, which decisions do not sustain the contention made. These were Anti-Trust cases with the same subdivision, A......
-
Schnitzer v. Southwest Shoe Corp.
...that the other person will sell on the premises only the products or merchandise of the owner or lessor. Fort Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. State, 99 Tex. 34, 87 S.W. 336, 70 L.R.A. 950; Celli & Del Papa v. Galveston Brewing Co., Tex.Com.App., 227 S.W. 941; Edwards v. Old Settlers' Ass'n., Tex.C......
- State v. Gulf Refining Co.
Get Started for Free