FTC v. DEAN FOODS COMPANY

Citation356 F.2d 481
Decision Date18 February 1966
Docket NumberNo. 15493.,15493.
PartiesFEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Petitioner, v. DEAN FOODS COMPANY and Bowman Dairy Company, Respondents.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)

J. B. Truly, Federal Trade Comm., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

L. Edward Hart and Hammond E. Chaffetz, Chicago, Ill., for respondents.

Before SCHNACKENBERG, CASTLE and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Federal Trade Commission, petitioner herein, filed its petition in this court on December 30, 1965 praying for a preliminary injunction, a temporary restraining order and other relief in aid of the jurisdiction of this court, under 15 U.S.C. §§ 21(c) and 45(c), to review final orders of the Federal Trade Commission, and therein represented to this court that the question presented was "whether this Court should exercise its discretion to grant equitable relief to preserve the status quo pendente lite, where the respondents will imminently consummate a merger (1) which will probably violate the antitrust laws, and (2) against which the Commission's ability to enter an effective order will probably be seriously impaired, unless the respondents are appropriately restrained by this court."

According to petitioner, the statutes involved are: the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a); the Clayton Act, §§ 18 § 7 and 21 (c) § 11(c), 15 U.S.C; and the Federal Trade Commission Act, § 45(a) (1) § 5(a) (1), and (c) § 5 (c), 15 U.S.C.

This court entered on January 4, 1966, a temporary restraining order herein pursuant to the petition therefor filed by the Commission, in which it was charged that a complaint had been filed by the Commission against the respondents Dean and Bowman, instituting the administrative proceeding now pending before the Commission, in respect to their agreement for the sale of Bowman to Dean and charging that such agreement and acquisition are in violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act and § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 18 and 45(a)(1).

Said restraining order is still in full force and effect according to its terms and provisions, inasmuch as an emergency petition for preliminary injunction filed by said Commission is pending and unadjudicated at this date.

Dean Foods Company and Bowman Dairy Company, respondents, having filed herein on January 5, 1966 their brief challenging the authority of the Commission to obtain a preliminary injunction against a supposed violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act or § 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act and asserting that the sole grant of enforcement...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Company
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • June 13, 1966
    ...said measures were not enacted into law and Congress has not provided otherwise for bestowing this authority upon said Commission.' 356 F.2d 481, 482. A few hours after the Court of Appeals entered its order on January 19, 1966, the contract was closed and Dean acquired legal title to Bowma......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT