Fuentes v. Griffin
| Docket Number | 14-3878 |
| Decision Date | 15 July 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
36 cases
-
State v. Dyous
...recognized as "an objective authority on the subject of mental disorders ...." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Fuentes v. Griffin , 829 F.3d 233, 249 (2d. Cir. 2016). We note that the diagnoses set forth in the board's report and mentioned by Gusfa are found in the DSM-5. See American P......
-
In re Mulamba
...perceive, recall, and relate information. Thus, mental health records also constitute important impeachment material. Fuentes v. Griffin , 829 F.3d 233, 236 (2d Cir. 2016) (psychiatric records material to impeach witness's credibility); United States v. Moore , 923 F.2d 910, 913 (1st Cir. 1......
-
McCray v. Capra
...v. Andrade , 538 U.S. 63, 73, 123 S.Ct. 1166, 155 L.Ed.2d 144 (2003) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Fuentes v. Griffin , 829 F.3d 233, 244 (2d Cir. 2016). "[C]learly established law as determined by [the Supreme] Court refers to the holdings, as opposed to the dicta, of [the S......
-
United States v. Teman
...that there is a reasonable probability that the suppressed evidence would have produced a different verdict."); Fuentes v. T. Griffin , 829 F.3d 233, 245–47 (2d Cir. 2016) ("[T]he Brady materiality ‘question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different v......
Get Started for Free