Fulford v. Dutton
| Decision Date | 06 July 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 24306.,24306. |
| Citation | 380 F.2d 16 |
| Parties | John C. FULFORD, Appellant, v. A. L. DUTTON, Warden, Georgia State Prison, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
John C. Fulford, pro se.
Mathew Robins, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Before RIVES and DYER, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge.
Appellant was tried and convicted of robbery with an offensive weapon. Although the jury recommended that the crime be treated as a misdemeanor, the trial judge refused to act upon that recommendation and sentenced appellant to serve ten years in the Georgia penitentiary. The conviction was affirmed by the Georgia Supreme Court. Appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied by the Georgia courts. Appellant has exhausted his state remedies.
Appellant filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus with the District Court. After holding an evidentiary hearing the District Court denied the petition from which this appeal was taken. We affirm.
Appellant attacks the sufficiency and admissibility of the evidence offered to convict him. This is unavailing because insufficiency of the evidence is not reviewable by writ of habeas corpus in the federal courts. Fernandez v. Klinger, 9 Cir. 1965, 346 F.2d 210, 211. Appellant also contends that he is innocent and could establish an alibi through certain records located in Alabama. However, innocence is not a proper matter for consideration in a habeas corpus proceeding. Palakiko v. Harper, 9 Cir. 1953, 209 F.2d 75, 95.
Appellant further urges that the trial judge erred in setting a ten year sentence instead of following the jury's recommendation. The law in Georgia provides that "it is in the `discretion of the trial judge whether he will approve such recommendation, and his action in the matter is final.' * * *" Harris v. Georgia, 216 Ga. 740, 119 S.E.2d 352.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hoover v. Beto
...witness be attacked in Federal Habeas Corpus proceedings"). See also Pleas v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 56, 57; Fulford v. Dutton, 5 Cir. 1967, 380 F.2d 16, 17. There can be no question in this case that the jury believed the State's witnesses, including Spivey, or it would not hav......
-
Anderson v. Maggio, 76-2750
...a total lack of evidence, the petitioner's claim of innocence is not to be evaluated in a review of his petition. Fulford v. Dutton, 380 F.2d 16 (5th Cir. 1967); Shaver v. Ellis,255 F.2d 509 (5th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 864, 78 S.Ct. 98, 2 L.Ed.2d 70. In the present case, while w......
-
Bonaparte v. Smith, Civ. A. No. 2724.
...Sufficiency of the evidence is not a ground for federal habeas corpus relief. Pleas v. Wainwright, 441 F.2d 56 (5th Cir.); Fulford v. Dutton, 380 F.2d 16 (5th Cir.). The evidence fully supported a verdict, as the Supreme Court of Georgia has 9. Petitioner's final allegation (illegal grand j......
-
Pitts v. Hopper, C74-739A.
...of the evidence, Young v. State of Alabama, 443 F.2d 854 (5 Cir. 1971); Hopkins v. Wainwright, 458 F.2d 393 (5 Cir. 1972); Fulford v. Dutton, 380 F.2d 16 (5 Cir. 1972), unless the conviction is so devoid of evidentiary support as to raise a due process issue; Johnson v. Turner, 429 F.2d 115......