Funding v. Boyles
Decision Date | 23 October 2009 |
Docket Number | 2080442. |
Citation | 70 So.3d 1221 |
Parties | LVNV FUNDING, LLCv.Tammie Lynn (Moncries) BOYLES. |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
David R. Pruet III and Wesley B. Gilchrist of Lightfoot, Franklin & White, L.L.C., Birmingham, for appellant.Jerry O. Lorant of Lorant & Associates, PC, Birmingham, for appellee.BRYAN, Judge.
LVNV Funding, LLC (“LVNV”), appeals from a judgment denying its motion to vacate a default judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4), Ala. R. Civ. P. 1 We reverse and remand.
On April 18, 2006, Tammie Lynn (Moncries) Boyles sued LVNV in the Jefferson Circuit Court (“the circuit court”). In pertinent part, Boyles's complaint alleged that LVNV was “one and the same as Resurgent Capital Services, L.P.[,] a corporation, of Houston, Texas, and one and the same as Resurgent Services Capital, a corporation[,] of Greenville, South Carolina”; that LVNV was “doing business as Sherman Acquisition, Inc.”; that LVNV had committed the tort of invasion of privacy by intentionally, willfully, and maliciously harassing Boyles with communications seeking to collect a debt that Boyles did not owe; and that LVNV had committed the torts of fraud and deceit by suing Boyles to recover a debt that LVNV knew Boyles did not owe. As relief, Boyles prayed for an award of damages in the amount of $50,000. Boyles's complaint instructed the circuit court clerk to serve LVNV with process by certified mail and to address it as follows:
“Kathy James
LVNV Funding, LLC
Greenville, SC 29601”
The circuit court clerk complied with Boyles's instructions and received a return receipt signed by Brandi Taylor.
After more than 30 days had elapsed from the date Taylor had signed the return receipt, the circuit court clerk notified Boyles that LVNV had not answered or otherwise defended against Boyles's complaint. Boyles requested that the circuit court clerk enter a default against LVNV; however, the circuit court clerk did not do so. Thereafter, Boyles moved the circuit court to enter a default judgment against LVNV with leave for Boyles to prove the amount of her damages. On August 19, 2006, the circuit court entered an order stating that “a Judgment is rendered against LVNV Funding, LLC, one and the same as Resurgent Capital Services, and one and the same as Sherman Financial Group, doing business under the name of LVNV Funding, Inc.[,] the same being in default, with leave to prove damages.” On December 14, 2006, the circuit court, without giving LVNV notice, held an evidentiary hearing for Boyles to prove the amount of her damages. On December 18, 2006, the circuit court entered a judgment stating:
On January 16, 2008, Boyles's attorney sent LVNV's attorney a copy of the default judgment by facsimile transmission. On February 15, 2008, LVNV filed a motion pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4), Ala. R. Civ. P., seeking relief from the judgment entered against it on the ground that the judgment was void because LVNV had not been properly served with process in accordance with Rule 4, Ala. R. Civ. P. Specifically, LVNV asserted that it had not been properly served with process because, it said, Rule 4 required that the process be addressed to an officer of LVNV, a partner (other than a limited partner) in LVNV, a managing or general agent of LVNV, or an agent authorized by appointment or by law to receive service of process on behalf of LVNV and Kathy James, the person to whom the process had been addressed, was not such an officer, partner, or agent. In support of its motion, LVNV submitted an affidavit signed by Tammy Garrett, which stated, in pertinent part:
In opposition to LVNV's motion, Boyles asserted that James was a proper person to receive service of process on behalf of LVNV because James had submitted an affidavit that she had signed as attorney-in-fact for LVNV in the action that LVNV had filed against Boyles. Boyles introduced that affidavit, which stated:
“The undersigned LVNV Funding LLC Representative, upon being duly sworn, deposes and says:
“Print Name: Kathy JamesTitle: Attorney in Fact”
LVNV subsequently submitted two affidavits signed by Jean Paul Torres and an affidavit signed by Gail Conway. The first affidavit signed by Torres stated, in pertinent part:
In pertinent part, the document attached to the first affidavit signed by Torres stated:
“ALEGIS GROUP LLC
WRITTEN CONSENT ACTION OF
THE BOARD OF MANAGERS
IN LIEU OF A MEETING
“The undersigned being all the Managers of Alegis Group, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the ‘Company’), in accordance with and pursuant to Section 18–404(d) of the Delaware Limited Liability Company Act, do hereby consent to, adopt and approve the following resolutions on behalf of the Company and on behalf of Resurgent Capital Services L.P., in its capacity as general manager of Resurgent Capital Services L.P.
“RESOLVED, that this consent action (‘Consent Action’) shall have the same force and effect as though adopted at a meeting of the Company's Board of Managers duly called and held.
“APPOINTMENT OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES
OF THE COMPANY
“RESOLVED, that the following persons be, and hereby are, appointed Authorized Representatives of the Company for the limited purpose of signing, under authority granted in the accordance with general Company corporate authority, affidavits as attorney in fact of LVNV Funding LLC (‘LVNV’), attesting to balance,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hooper v. Midland Funding, LLC
... ... 2000)). Accordingly, ... “[d]iscretion plays no part in determining whether a ... default judgment is void. ‘If the judgment is valid, it ... must stand; if it is void, it must be set aside.'” ... ( Id. at 18) (quoting LVNV Funding, LLC v ... Boyles , 70 So.3d 1221, 1227 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009)) ... Pursuant to these principles, Hooper maintains, “[h]ad ... [the state court] held that [he] did in fact sign the return ... of service and was in fact served, the default judgment would ... not have been set aside.” ( Id ... ...
-
D.B. v. D.G.
...of proof is on the plaintiff to prove that service of process was performed correctly and legally.” ’ ” ' ” LVNV Funding, LLC v. Boyles, 70 So.3d 1221, 1227 (Ala.Civ.App.2009) (quoting Dennis v. Still Waters Residential Ass'n, 18 So.3d 959, 961 (Ala.Civ.App.2009), quoting in turn Bank of Am......
-
Davis v. Cntry. Cas. Ins. Co., CASE NO. 6:13-cv-513-SLB
...2003) (no proper service over bank where plaintiff had served its subsidiary rather than bank's agent); LVNV Funding, LLC v. Boyles, 70 So. 3d 1221, 1232 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009) (default judgment against defendant void where plaintiff failed to properly serve agent of defendant). The fact tha......
-
Hines v. Regions Bank
...in the foreclosure proceeding does not make that firm Region's general agent for service of process. See LVNV Funding, LLC v. Boyles, 70 So. 3d 1221, 1228 (Ala. Civ. App. 2009) (holding that a party's attorney did not, by virtue of its representation alone, become the party's agent for serv......