G. Ricordi & Co. v. Mason

Decision Date09 December 1913
Docket Number76.
PartiesG. RICORDI & CO. v. MASON.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit

Nathan Burkan, of New York City, for appellant.

G. F. Lewis, of New York City (Alex. P. Browne, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for appellee.

Before LACOMBE, WARD, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

It seems unnecessary to add anything to the two opinions referred to supra. We are clearly of the opinion that these extremely brief epitomes of the plots of the two operas, the librettos of which have been copyrighted and are the property of complainant, are neither of them in any true sense 'a version' of the copyrighted work, as that word is used in the statute.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Loew's Incorporated v. Columbia Broadcasting System
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • May 6, 1955
    ...F.2d 82, 89, but taking of citations held an infringement. 21 G. Ricordi & Co. v. Mason, C.C.N.Y. 1911, 201 F. 182, 184, affirmed, 2 Cir., 1913, 210 F. 277. 22 Kipling v. G. P. Putnam's Sons, 2 Cir., 1903, 120 F. 631, 635. 23 Dun v. International Mercantile Agency, C.C.N.Y.1903, 127 F. 173.......
  • Twin Peaks Productions, Inc. v. Publications Intern., Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • July 6, 1993
    ...and superficial idea of the plot and of the characters," G. Ricordi & Co. v. Mason, 201 F. 182, 182 (C.C.S.D.N.Y.1911), aff'd, 210 F. 277 (2d Cir.1913), and further indicated [i]f this case involved an abridgment as that word is ordinarily understood, I should be inclined to take a differen......
  • Toho Co., Ltd. v. William Morrow and Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Central District of California
    • April 6, 1998
    ...Book contains summaries that can be described as "vague, fragmentary and superficial." G. Ricordi & Co. v. Mason, 201 F. 182, aff'd 210 F. 277 (2d Cir.1913). Morrow also contends that the Book only contains that which was necessary to inform the commentary and the other facts set forth ther......
  • Corcoran v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 28, 1941
    ...decisions. The phrase has been held to apply to abridgements. G. Ricordi & Co. v. Mason, C.C., 201 F. 182; Id., D.C., 201 F. 184; Id., 2 Cir., 210 F. 277; Macmillan Co. v. King, 223 F. 862. It has been suggested that it refers to versions of a literary nature. Ladas, The International Prote......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT