G.S. Johnson Co. v. Beloosky
Decision Date | 03 June 1914 |
Docket Number | No. 9377.,9377. |
Citation | 263 Ill. 363,105 N.E. 287 |
Parties | G. S. JOHNSON CO. v. BELOOSKY. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Rock Island County Court; Benjamin I. Bell, Judge.
Action by the G. S. Johnson Company against Rossie Beloosky. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Albert Huber, of Rock Island, and Blum, Wolfsohn & Blum, of Chicago (Henry S. Blum, of Chicago, of counsel), for appellant.
McEniry & McEniry, of Moline (M. J. McEniry, of Moline, of counsel), for appellee.
Ernest Pilatt was engaged in the bakery business, and used in connection therewith a delivery wagon and a team of horses. He made a bill of sale covering his entire stock in trade, store fixtures, and the wagon and team used in connection with the business to Rossie Beloosky. Subsequently the G. S. Johnson Company, being a creditor of Pilatt, levied an attachment upon the goods and chattels sold to appellee, basing the attachment upon the failure to comply with an act of the Legislature known as the Bulk Sales Act of 1913. It is admitted that no attempt was made to comply with the act in making the sale. The sole question presented for our determination is the constitutionality of the Bulk Sales Act of 1913. The court below held the act to be invalid and gave judgment for the defendant.The plaintiff in the attachment proceeding has prosecuted an appeal direct to this court.
[1] The Bulk Sales Act passed in 1913 is entitled ‘An act to regulate the sale or transfer of goods, wares, merchandise, and other chattels in bulk and to provide certain penalties in connection therewith.’ The act, which is found at page 258 in the Laws of 1913, is as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gazett v. Iola Co-Op. Mercantile Co.
... ... ) to meet the objections suggested in those decisions, and then declared constitutional in Johnson Co. v. Beloosky, 263 Ill. 363, 105 N. E. 287, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 411. In New York the law was amended ... ...
-
Stubbe v. Adamson
...of N. Y. v. Gilmour, 149 N. Y. 453, 44 N. E. 177,52 Am. St. Rep. 748;People v. Cipperly, 101 N. Y. 634, 4 N. E. 107;Johnson Co. v. Beloosky, 263 Ill. 363, 105 N. E. 287;Landberg v. City of Chicago, 237 Ill. 112, 86 N. E. 638,127 Am. St. Rep. 319, 21 L. R. A. (N. S.) 830;Stevenson v. Colgan,......
-
Broad Street National Bank v. Lit Bros
... ... chattels of the vendor's business in bulk." ... Thereunder, it is held in Johnson Co. v. Beloosky, ... 263 Ill. 363, 105 N.E. 287, to include the products of a ... manufacturer ... ...
-
Independent Breweries. Co. v. Lawton
... ... See, also, Johnson v. Kelly, 32 N. D. 110, 155 N. W. 683, and Swanson v. De Vine (Utah) 160 Pac. 872, holding that the ... See, also, G. S. Johnson Co. v. Beloosky, 263 Ill. 363, 105 N. E. 287, Ann. Cas. 1915C, 411 ... In the April, 1918, number ... ...