Gaboury v. Cent. Vermont Ry. Co.

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtCARDOZO
Citation250 N.Y. 233,165 N.E. 275
PartiesGABOURY v. CENTRAL VERMONT RY. CO.
Decision Date13 February 1929

250 N.Y. 233
165 N.E. 275

GABOURY
v.
CENTRAL VERMONT RY.
CO.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Feb. 13, 1929.


Action by Florida Gaboury, as ancillary administrator of the estate of Aime Gaboury, deceased, against the Central Vermont Railway Company. An order of the Supreme Court denying defendant's motion to vacate the service of summons and dismiss the complaint for want of jurisdiction (132 Misc. Rep. 144, 228 N. Y. S. 705) was affirmed by the Appellate Division by a divided court (225 App. Div. 145, 231 N. Y. S. 630), defendant appeals, and the Appellate Division certifies question.

Orders of Appellate Division and Special Term reversed, motion granted, and question certified answered.

The Appellate Division certified the following question:

‘Was valid service of process in this action made upon the defendant?’

[165 N.E. 276]


[250 N.Y. 234]Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

Paxton Blair, of New York City, and Charles G. Fryer, of Schenectady, for appellant.

250 N.Y. 235]Walter A. Fullerton, and Edward W. Barrett, both of Saratoga Springs, for respondent.
CARDOZO, C. J.

Aime Gaboury, a resident of Vermont, lost his life in that state in November, 1927, while employed as a trainman by the defendant, Central Vermont Railway Company, a Vermont corporation. His father, Florida Gaboury, also a resident of Vermont, was appointed ancillary administrator of his estate by the Surrogate's Court of Clinton county, N. Y. In an action to recover damages for injuries to dependent next of kin, the summons was served on a director residing in this state. The question is whether jurisdiction was acquired.

At Rouses Point, N. Y., there is a terminal yard with equipment, the property of the Central Vermont Railway Company. There is a track, a fraction of a mile long, [250 N.Y. 236]connecting the terminal with the line of railroad in Vermont. At the city of New York there is a pier leased by the defendant for the use of its steamships sailing between New York and New London, and thence to Portland, Me. There is also a freight office and an agency for the sale of tickets. The business is wholly interstate. Neither the vessels nor the trains carry passengers or property between places in New York.

The accident occurred near Williston, Vt., on November 24, 1927. On December 12, 1927, a decree was made by the United States District Court for the District of Vermont whereby receivers were appointed to run the defendant's railroad and conduct its business generally, and whereby the defendant, its officers, agents, and directors, were restrained from interfering with the possession of the receivers or the discharge of their official duties. A copy of the decree was filed in the Northern District of New York in accordance with the statute. U. S. Code, title 28, § 117; Judicial Code, § 56 (28 USCA § 117). At the time of the service of the summons on March 6, 1928, the business formerly the defendant's was run by the receivers.

A foreign corporation, to be subject to the service of process in New York, must have so acted as to have subjected itself to the jurisdiction of the state. It does so act when at the time of service it is doing business within our borders under the protection of our laws. Even then there are nice distinctions as to the extent of its submission when the cause of action is unrelated to the business here transacted. Pennsylvania Fire Ins. Co. of Philadelphia v. Gold Issue Min. & Mill. Co., 243 U. S. 93, 37 S. Ct. 344, 61 L. Ed. 610;Bagdon v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 217 N. Y. 432, 111 N. E. 1075, L. R. A. 1916F, 407, Ann. Cas. 1918A, 389, distinguishing Old Wayne Mut. Life Ass'n of Indianapolis, Ind., v. McDonough, 204 U. S. 8, 27 S. Ct. 236, 51 L. Ed. 345, and Simon v. Southern R. Co., 236 U. S. 115, 35 S. Ct. 255, 59 L. Ed. 492;Tauza v. Susquehanna Coal Co., 220 N....

To continue reading

Request your trial
31 practice notes
  • Aybar v. Aybar, 54
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • October 7, 2021
    ..."doing business within our borders" when service was made upon an appropriate corporate officer or agent (Gaboury v. Central Vt. Ry. Co., 250 N.Y. 233, 236, 165 N.E. 275 [1929] ). And as Tauza held, citing Bagdon, when "the defendant corporation is engaged in business within this state ... ......
  • Aybar v. Aybar, 54
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • October 7, 2021
    ..."doing business within our borders" when service was made upon an appropriate corporate officer or agent (Gaboury v. Central Vt. Ry. Co., 250 N.Y. 233, 236, 165 N.E. 275 [1929] ). And as Tauza held, citing Bagdon, when "the defendant corporation is engaged in business within this state ... ......
  • Top Form Mills, Inc. v. SOCIEDAD NATIONALE IND., ETC., 75 Civ. 4940.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • March 16, 1977
    ..."presence" by virtue of doing business in New York is the time of the commencement of the action. See Gaboury v. Central Vermont Ry. Co., 250 N.Y. 233, 165 N.E. 275 (1929); Propulsion Systems, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 77 Misc.2d 259, 260, 352 N.Y. S.2d 749 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Co.1973). Top......
  • Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Intern., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • May 18, 1967
    ...86 N.E.2d 564, 565--566; Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc., v. McCarthy, 290 N.Y. 437, 444, 49 N.E.2d 517, 520; Gaboury v. Central Vermont Ry. Co., 250 N.Y. 233, 238, 165 N.E. 275, 277; Holzer v. Dodge Bros., 233 N.Y. 216, 221, 135 N.E. 268, 269; see Simonson v. International Bank, 14 N.Y.2d 281, 285......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
31 cases
  • Aybar v. Aybar, 54
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • October 7, 2021
    ..."doing business within our borders" when service was made upon an appropriate corporate officer or agent (Gaboury v. Central Vt. Ry. Co., 250 N.Y. 233, 236, 165 N.E. 275 [1929] ). And as Tauza held, citing Bagdon, when "the defendant corporation is engaged in business within this state ... ......
  • Aybar v. Aybar, 54
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • October 7, 2021
    ..."doing business within our borders" when service was made upon an appropriate corporate officer or agent (Gaboury v. Central Vt. Ry. Co., 250 N.Y. 233, 236, 165 N.E. 275 [1929] ). And as Tauza held, citing Bagdon, when "the defendant corporation is engaged in business within this state ... ......
  • Top Form Mills, Inc. v. SOCIEDAD NATIONALE IND., ETC., 75 Civ. 4940.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • March 16, 1977
    ..."presence" by virtue of doing business in New York is the time of the commencement of the action. See Gaboury v. Central Vermont Ry. Co., 250 N.Y. 233, 165 N.E. 275 (1929); Propulsion Systems, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 77 Misc.2d 259, 260, 352 N.Y. S.2d 749 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Co.1973). Top......
  • Frummer v. Hilton Hotels Intern., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • May 18, 1967
    ...86 N.E.2d 564, 565--566; Yeckes-Eichenbaum, Inc., v. McCarthy, 290 N.Y. 437, 444, 49 N.E.2d 517, 520; Gaboury v. Central Vermont Ry. Co., 250 N.Y. 233, 238, 165 N.E. 275, 277; Holzer v. Dodge Bros., 233 N.Y. 216, 221, 135 N.E. 268, 269; see Simonson v. International Bank, 14 N.Y.2d 281, 285......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT