Gaine v. Burnett
Decision Date | 04 February 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 248.,248. |
Citation | 122 N.J.L. 39,4 A.2d 37 |
Parties | GAINE v. BURNETT, Commissioner of Alcoholic Beverage Control. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Certiorari proceeding by John Gaine against D. Frederick Burnett, Commissioner of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of New Jersey, to review a determination that the prosecutor had violated a regulation of the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.
Writ dismissed.
Argued January term, 1939, before BROGAN, C. J., and BODINE and HEHER, JJ.
Quinn & Doremus and John J. Quinn, all of Red Bank, and William F. Hanlon, of New York City, for prosecutor.
Nathan L. Jacobs, of Newark, for defendant.
The prosecutor of this writ brings up for review his conviction for a violation of rule 6 of Regulation 30 of the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. He sold whiskey below the price fixed by the Commissioner.
The sale of intoxicating liquor from early times has been a regulated matter. By the laws of 1738-39, tavern keepers were obliged to apply to the justices of the peace annually in open court for a license. Allinson's Laws, p. 103. The justices of the peace fixed the price at which liquor was to be sold and the licensee was obliged to post, in a conspicuous place in his premises, the prices so fixed and was also subject to a penalty for a non observance of the regulation. Id. p. 105. After the revolution, like provisions were reenacted, together with a ban on gaming of any sort, in places where liquor was sold. Paterson, pp. 237, 238. The Court of Common Pleas, for a long time, under legislative direction continued to grant licenses and fixed the prices for the liquor at its Spring Session. Nixon's Digest 1709-1755, p. 340, sec. 21, Rev St 1847, sec. 21, p. 581. This provision was, however, repealed before the Revision of 1877. In that work the bulk of the act, as contained in the Revised Statutes 1847, was continued with the additions of various supplements authorizing the granting of licenses in some municipalities by township committee or common council, vesting in them discretion in the amount of licensee fees and the control of the sale of liquor.
Chapter 208, P.L.1938, p. 492 N.J.St. Annual 1938", 33:1-23.1, 23.1 note, is as follows:
Chapter 165, P.L.1938, p. 375, R.S.1937, 56:4-5, 56:4-5 note, 56:4-6 referred to, purported to protect the owner of trade marked articles from resale, except at the price fixed by contract.
After the enactment of this legislation, and pursuant to the power vested in the Commissioner by the Control Act of 1933, R.S. 33:1, he promulgated Regulation 30. Sections 6 and 7 are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McNeil v. McDonough
...and control of alcoholic beverages, however, goes back much farther than that, perhaps as far back as Allinson's Laws. (1738-1739) Gaine v. Burnett, 122 N.J.L. 39, 4 A.2d 37 (S.Ct.1939) reviews this long history before federal Prohibition and The 1933 statute followed an exhaustive study an......
-
Mazza v. Cavicchia
...130 N.J.L. 554, 33 A.2d 900 (E. & A.1943), certiorari denied, 320 U.S. 801, 64 S.Ct. 431, 88 L.Ed. 484 (1944); Gaine v. Burnett, 122 N.J.L. 39, 4 A.2d 37 (Sup.Ct.1939), affirmed 123 N.J.L. 317, 8 A.2d 604 (E. & A.1939). Although the majority have dealt at length with them, we are in nowise ......
-
Grand Union Co. v. Sills
...were 'detrimental to the proper operation of the liquor industry and contrary to the interests of temperance.' In Gaine v. Burnett, 122 N.J.L. 39, 4 A.2d 37 (Sup.Ct.), aff'd, 123 N.J.L. 317, 8 A.2d 604 (E. & A. 1939), the court held that even without this specific legislation the Commission......
-
Ward v. Scott
...The Commissioner of Alcoholic Beverage Control, with authority to fix prices and promulgate regulations (Gaine v. Burnett, 122 N.J.L. 39, 4 A.2d 37 (Sup.Ct.1939) affirmed 123 N.J.L. 317, 8 A.2d 604 (E. & A.1939)), has been guided by the general legislative pronouncement that the statute sha......