Gaines v. State, 24836

Decision Date21 June 1950
Docket NumberNo. 24836,24836
CitationGaines v. State, 231 S.W.2d 429, 155 Tex.Crim. 79 (Tex. Crim. App. 1950)
PartiesGAINES v. STATE.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

B. R. Reeves, of Palestine, for appellant.

George P. Blackburn, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of possessing whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area, and his punishment was assessed at 90 days in jail and a fine of $100.

The State relied on the testimony of the sheriff to the effect that he saw appellant in a car with two others, and that appellant was in the act of pouring some whiskey out of a pint bottle; that he mopped some of it up and produced it upon the trial.

The only other evidence was an agreement that the area was dry, and proof that some seven years previously, appellant had been convicted on a plea of guilty to possession of whiskey for the purpose of sale in a dry area in three cases.

Such evidence of prior convictions was not admissible for any purpose, and appellant's objection thereto should have been sustained.

Proof of recent sales of liquor in a dry area by the accused has been held admissible on his trial for possession of liquor for the purpose of sale in such an area. See Smiley v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 342, 174 S.W.2d 973.

But a sale 15 months prior to the possession by an accused of less than a quart of whiskey in a dry area has been held insufficient to prove possession for the purpose of sale. See Albin v. State, 148 Tex.Cr.R. 114, 185 S.W.2d 447.

The rule permitting proof of a prior sale has no application to testimony showing that the accused...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
9 cases
  • Tucker v. State, 32181
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 12, 1960
    ...proof of the prior convictions was not admissible for any purpose. McCoy v. State, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 315, 263 S.W.2d 782; Gaines v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 79, 231 S.W.2d 429; Burris v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 327 S.W.2d Also, proof of the other violation of the liquor laws for which appellant had bee......
  • Davidson v. State, 27600
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 11, 1955
    ...of such liquor in a dry area is admissible on the issue of intent. Smiley v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 342, 174 S.W.2d 973; Gaines v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 79, 231 S.W.2d 429; Williams v. State, 119 Tex.Cr.R. 340, 43 S.W.2d 98; Atwood v. State, 96 Tex.Cr.R. 249, 257 S.W. This rule has no applicat......
  • Dewberry v. State, 27798
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • November 2, 1955
    ...is called for. Sanders v. State, 18 Tex.App. 372; Adcock v. State (3 Cases), Tex.Cr.App., 212 S.W.2d 175, 176, 177; Gaines v. State, 155 Tex.Cr. R. 79, 231 S.W.2d 429. Believing that it is the duty and responsibility of this Court to pass upon the question, I respectfully enter this my The ......
  • Washington v. State, s. 54570
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 1, 1977
    ...212 S.W.2d 175 (the defendant was convicted of a misdemeanor upon complaint only, no information having been filed), Gaines v. State, 155 Tex.Cr.R. 79, 231 S.W.2d 429 (the judgment was reformed to comply with the jury's verdict), Lowe v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 427 S.W.2d 867 (the judgment and ......
  • Get Started for Free