Gallegos v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE AT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
| Decision Date | 02 November 1962 |
| Docket Number | No. 17815.,17815. |
| Citation | 310 F.2d 688 |
| Parties | Edgar Allan GALLEGOS and Ana Gloria Gallegos, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE AT LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners.
Francis C. Whelan, U. S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief, Civil Section, James R. Dooley, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Gordon Levy, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Before MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.*
Petitioners seek review of actions of the Immigration Service. They have been subjected to an order of deportation, have unsuccessfully pursued judicial review of that order. Gallegos v. Hoy, 9 Cir., 1958, 262 F.2d 665, certiorari denied, 1959, 360 U.S. 935, 79 S.Ct. 1456, 3 L.Ed.2d 1547. They then filed a petition to reopen the deportation proceedings in order that they might apply for discretionary relief from deportation. That petition was denied by the Board of Immigration Appeals and the present petition for review was filed in the District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division. The matter has been transferred to this court under 75 Stat. 650.
This court has taken the position that under 75 Stat. 650, we have original jurisdiction to review only final orders of deportation. Holz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1962, 309 F.2d 452; Mai Kai Fong v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1962, 305 F.2d 239; Giova v. Rosenberg, 1962, 308 F.2d 347.
An order denying the reopening of proceedings is not such an order.
It is therefore ordered that this matter be retransferred to the District Court for the Southern District of California, Central Division.
* The Honorable CLIFTON MATHEWS, Circuit Judge, also participated in this matter when it was argued before this court. His death has occurred since this matter was submitted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lam Man Chi v. Bouchard
...United States District Court pending in the District Court on the effective date of the 1961 Act. Cf. Gallegos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 310 F. 2d 688 (9 Cir., 1962), in connection with Gallegos v. Hoy, 262 F.2d 665 (9 Cir., 1958). But see Holz v. Immigration and Naturaliza......
-
Murillo-Aguilera v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv.
...to the motion for reconsideration is true also concerning the application for suspension of deportation. Gallegos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 310 F.2d 688. It is ordered that this matter be retransferred to the District Court for the Southern District of California, C......
-
Pipkin v. City of Moore, Okl.
... ... See Singh v. Cities Service Oil Co., 554 P.2d 1367, 1368-69 (Okla.1976) ... ...
-
Wright v. Rhay
... ... dismiss the complaint sua sponte before service of process if it were filed by one tendering the ... ...