Gallip v. City of Rutland

Citation712 A.2d 394, 168 Vt. 646
Case DateMay 13, 1998
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Vermont

Page 394

712 A.2d 394
Gallip
v.
City of Rutland
NO. 96-516
Supreme Court of Vermont
May 13, 1998

Trial Forum: Rut. Sup.

Disposition: Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 practice notes
  • Gallipo v. City of Rutland, No. 00-217.
    • United States
    • Vermont United States State Supreme Court of Vermont
    • December 21, 2001
    ...retaliated against him because of his discrimination claims; it awarded substantial damages. We affirmed in Gallipo v. City of Rutland, 168 Vt. 646, 712 A.2d 394 (1998) (unpublished mem.) (Gallipo Because of a dispute over insurance coverage, defendants sought successfully to delay paying t......
1 cases
  • Gallipo v. City of Rutland, No. 00-217.
    • United States
    • Vermont United States State Supreme Court of Vermont
    • December 21, 2001
    ...retaliated against him because of his discrimination claims; it awarded substantial damages. We affirmed in Gallipo v. City of Rutland, 168 Vt. 646, 712 A.2d 394 (1998) (unpublished mem.) (Gallipo Because of a dispute over insurance coverage, defendants sought successfully to delay paying t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT