Gallo v. Texas

Decision Date02 June 2008
Docket NumberNo. 07–9590.,07–9590.
Citation553 U.S. 1080,128 S.Ct. 2872,171 L.Ed.2d 813,76 USLW 3635
PartiesTomas Raul GALLO, petitioner, v. TEXAS.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Case below, 239 S.W.3d 757.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
21 cases
  • Cuadros-fernandez v. The State Of Tex.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • August 28, 2009
    ...evidence or in determining a fact in issue. Gallo v. State, 239 S.W.3d 757, 765 (Tex.Crim.App.2007), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 128 S.Ct. 2872, 171 L.Ed.2d 813 (2008). The trial court held a hearing outside the presence of the jury to determine the admissibility of Gardner's opinions. Gar......
  • Rodriguez v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 2, 2018
    ...upon an abuse of discretion standard. Gallo v. State , 239 S.W.3d 757, 764 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007), cert. denied , 553 U.S. 1080, 128 S.Ct. 2872, 171 L.Ed. 2d 813 (2008). A trial court does not abuse its discretion so long as its decision is within the zone of reasonable disagreement and is ......
  • Moore v. Quarterman, No. 05-70038 (5th. Cir. 8/21/2009)
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • August 21, 2009
    ... ERIC LYNN MOORE, Petitioner-Appellee, ... NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, Respondent-Appellant ... No. 05-70038 ... United States Court of Appeals, ... "); Gallo v. State, 239 S.W.3d 757, 769-70 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (same) (emphasis added); Ex Parte Modden, 147 S.W.3d 293, 296 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004) ("In ... ...
  • Guerrero v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 20, 2017
    ...State's witness does not alone establish abuse of discretion (citing Heiselbetz , 906 S.W.2d at 512 )), pet. denied , 553 U.S. 1080, 128 S.Ct. 2872, 171 L.Ed.2d 813 (2008). Even assuming without deciding that the trial court erred by denying appellant's motion for continuance, appellant has......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT