Gallun v. Wolff (In re Mann's Will)
Decision Date | 05 December 1922 |
Citation | 190 N.W. 830,179 Wis. 66 |
Parties | IN RE MANN'S WILL. GALLUN v. WOLFF ET AL. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Circuit Court, Milwaukee County; John C. Karel, Judge.
In the matter of the Estate of Franklin P. Mann, deceased. On application by Albert F. Gallun, executor, against Frances Mann Wolff and others for construction of will. From the judgment rendered the executor appeals. Affirmed.
The will of Franklin P. Mann, duly admitted to probate by the county court of Milwaukee county, contained this provision:
The will was dated December 11, 1918. On April 10, 1920, the said testator by warranty deed conveyed his interest in and to said premises to said Frances Mann Wolff, said deed reciting that said premises were free and clear of incumbrances “except that certain mortgage of $20,000 * * * which said mortgage said second party, Frances Mann Wolff, hereby assumes and agrees to pay when due as a part of the consideration hereof.”
The executor of the will made application to the county court for a construction of paragraph 5 above quoted. The court by its judgment construed this provision of the will as a valid direction, charging the principal of said mortgage upon the general assets of the estate of said Franklin P. Mann, deceased. From such judgment the executor brings this appeal.Austin, Fehr, Mueller & Gehrz, of Milwaukee (William C. Quarles and Howard T. Foulkes, both of Milwaukee, of counsel), for appellant.
Paul D. Carpenter, of Milwaukee (Otto A. Lemke and Melville H. Sell, both of Milwaukee, of counsel), for respondent Alfred Mann.
OWEN, J. (after stating the facts as above).
The occasion calling for a construction of the will arises from the fact that subsequent to the execution thereof and prior to his death the testator by warranty deed conveyed his...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Estate of Kriefall v. Sizzler USA Franchise, Inc.
... ... for the sale of goods also include an implied warranty that the goods will be fit for the purpose for which the goods are required, unless such ... ...
-
EState Kriefall v. Sizzler U.S. Franchise Inc.
... ... We will sustain a discretionary determination if the circuit court examined the ... ...
-
Rhodes v. Kebke
... ... construction of the will of Herman Rhodes, deceased. The said ... Herman Rhodes was a successful ... ...
-
Estate of Brown, Matter of, 86CA1739
...encumbrances be paid from the residuary estate is clear and, in effect, constitutes a separate devise to his wife. See In re Mann's Will, 179 Wis. 66, 190 N.W. 830 (1922). The order is affirmed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this PLANK and FISCHBACH, JJ., ......