Gamble v. State, s. 61302

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Citation590 S.W.2d 507
Docket Number61303,No. 2,Nos. 61302,s. 61302,2
PartiesJames Earl GAMBLE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. Joe Nathan DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee
Decision Date12 December 1979

Page 507

590 S.W.2d 507
James Earl GAMBLE, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Joe Nathan DAVIS, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
Nos. 61302, 61303.
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, Panel No. 2.
Dec. 12, 1979.

Reed Jackson, Fairfield, for Gamble, on appeal only.

Steven A. Neal, Fairfield, for Davis, on appeal only.

Robert Huttash, State's Atty. and Alfred W. Walker, Asst. State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

Before ODOM, TOM G. DAVIS and CLINTON, JJ.

OPINION

TOM G. DAVIS, Judge.

Appeals are taken from convictions for aggravated robbery. 1 After the jury found that each appellant had previously been convicted of a felony offense, punishment was assessed at 15 years for Gamble and 25 years for Davis.

Appellants were convicted of robbing at gunpoint Wallace Coates at the Teague Jewelry Company in Teague on December 17, 1976. Coates stated that the assailants took several items of jewelry. Sue Fulcher, Coates' daughter, testified that she and her father were tied up in the store during the robbery by two individuals. Fulcher related that these individuals left the store and entered a white Cadillac driven by a third party. Neither Fulcher nor Coates could identify appellants as the individuals who robbed them.

Trooper Ronald Wood, of the Texas Department of Public Safety, testified that after overhearing a radio transmission reporting the robbery, he stopped a white Cadillac on Interstate 45 near Centerville. Appellants were inside the car with a third

Page 508

individual. A large amount of jewelry later identified as belonging to Coates was found inside the car.

Both appellants testified that the jewelry found in the car was purchased from Bubba Holley of Mexia. They stated that Holley was paid $3,000 for the jewelry near Teague on the morning of the robbery. Holley was driving a white Cadillac of a different year model than that appellants were stopped in by Trooper Wood.

The appellants complain of the court reporter's failure to transcribe his notes from final arguments at the guilt or innocence and punishment phase of the trial.

The record reflects that prior to trial both appellants requested the court reporter to make notes of the final arguments. This request was granted by the trial court. After they were convicted, both appellants requested the court reporter to transcribe his notes of the jury arguments and include such transcription in the record on appeal. On November 1, 1977, both appellants objected to the record on appeal in that the record did not include the jury arguments. The trial court sustained these objections to the record.

On August 17, 1978, the trial court overruled appellants' amended motion for a new trial. The motion requested a new trial based on the failure of the record on appeal to include the jury arguments. Attached as an exhibit to the motion was a letter dated July 7, 1977, from appellant Gamble's attorney, the Honorable Reed Jackson, to Mr. Jim Broom, Official Court Reporter for...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Harris v. State, 69366
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • June 28, 1989
    ...the appellate court cannot affirm the conviction. Austell v. State, 638 S.W.2d 888, 890 (Tex.Cr.App.1982). See also Gamble v. State, 590 S.W.2d 507 (Tex.Cr.App.1979); Timmons, supra, at 512; Pierson v. State, 147 Tex.Cr.R. 15, 177 S.W.2d 975, 976 (1944); Navarro v. State, 141 Tex.Cr.R. 196,......
  • 84 Hawai'i 211, State v. Bates, 18121
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Hawai'i
    • January 31, 1997
    ...denied, 506 U.S. 834, 113 S.Ct. 105, 121 L.Ed.2d 63 (1992); Austell v. State, 638 S.W.2d 888, 890 (Tex.Crim.App.1982); Gamble v. State, 590 S.W.2d 507, 509 6 This principle has been followed by various federal and state courts. See Kenney, 911 F.2d at 318 (where court reporter lost portion ......
  • Routier v. State, 72795.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • May 21, 2003
    ...(pretrial motion); Austell v. State, 638 S.W.2d 888, 890 (Tex. Crim.App.1982) (voir dire examination); Gamble v. State, 590 S.W.2d 507, 509 (Tex. Crim.App.1979) (final arguments); Hartgraves v. State, 374 S.W.2d 888, 890 (Tex. Crim.App.1964) (hearing on motion for new trial). We have said t......
  • State v. Perry, 84-875-CR
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
    • December 26, 1985
    ...v. State, 477 P.2d 398 (Okla.Crim.App.1969); Commonwealth v. Shields, 477 Pa. 105, 383 A.2d 844 (1978); [128 Wis.2d 306] Gamble v. State, 590 S.W.2d 507 (Tex.Crim.App.1979); State ex rel. Kisner v. Fox, 267 W.Va. 123, 267 S.E.2d 451 The fact that appellant's counsel on appeal did not repres......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT