Gangelhoff v. Transamerica Commercial Finance Corp.
| Decision Date | 13 January 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 92-00241,92-00241 |
| Citation | 611 So.2d 1333 |
| Parties | 18 Fla. L. Week. D301, 19 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 1246 David J. GANGELHOFF, d/b/a Gulf Marine of Clearwater, and David J. Gangelhoff, Individually, Appellants, v. TRANSAMERICA COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORPORATION, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
William W. Wilhelm, Clearwater, for appellants.
John C. Dew and Gail F. Moulds of Harris, Barrett, Mann & Dew, St. Petersburg, for appellee.
David Gangelhoff, the owner of Gulf Marine of Florida, has appealed from a final summary judgment in favor of Transamerica Commercial Finance Corporation. The court awarded Transamerica a deficiency judgment of over $100,000, together with interest, costs, and attorney's fees, for a total judgment of $133,817.87. This judgment was entered after Transamerica sold the collateral it had repossessed from Gulf Marine. Because there exists an issue of fact concerning the commercial reasonableness of the sale, we reverse.
Gulf Marine sold boats and engines. Gangelhoff, as owner of Gulf Marine, had executed an inventory security agreement and personal guaranty with Borg Warner Acceptance Corporation, the predecessor of Transamerica Commercial Finance Corporation. When Gangelhoff defaulted under the agreement, Transamerica sought to replevy the property. The court entered an order authorizing a writ of replevin and granted a break order. The collateral was repossessed and eventually sold. When Transamerica sought a deficiency judgment, Gangelhoff filed two affidavits in opposition, alleging that Transamerica had not notified him of the sale and that the price received by Transamerica represented only 39% of the wholesale value of the goods.
In the summary final judgment the court states that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. Under the circumstances before us, however, Gangelhoff's affidavit was sufficient to raise the question of whether the sale was commercially reasonable under section 679.504, Florida Statutes (1989). Transamerica's failure to give Gangelhoff notice raises a presumption that the sale was commercially unreasonable. CSI Service, Ltd. v. Hawkins Concrete Construction Co., 516 So.2d 337 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Moreover, a further presumption is that the fair market value of the collateral at the time of repossession was equal to the total secured debt. Weiner v. American Petrofina Marketing, Inc., 482 So.2d 1362 (Fla.1986). According to Weiner, the creditor...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re De Pasquale
...facts in dispute and BancFlorida is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The Debtor cites Gangelhoff v. Transamerica Commercial Finance Corp., 611 So.2d 1333 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App. 2d Dist.1993) for the proposition that whether a sale of collateral is made in a commercially reasonable manner......
-
79 Hawai'i 516, GECC Financial Corp. v. Jaffarian
...at 812; Clark Equipment Co. v. Mastelotto, Inc., 87 Cal.App.3d 88, 96, 150 Cal.Rptr. 797, 802 (1978); Gangelhoff v. Transamerica Commercial Fin. Corp., 611 So.2d 1333 (Fla.App.1993); Hall, 370 N.E.2d at 929; Jones v. Morgan, 58 Mich.App. 455, 458, 228 N.W.2d 419, 422 (1975); Gordon & Assoc.......
-
Pollock v. Florida Dept. of Highway Patrol
... ... In Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So.2d 1010 ... ...
-
Comerica Bank v. Mann
...the time of the repossession was equal to the total secured debt. Id.; Weiner, 482 So.2d at 1364 ; Gangelhoff v. Transamerica Comm. Fin. Corp., 611 So.2d 1333, 1334 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1993). The secured party may overcome this presumption by showing that the amount actually received at the sa......