Gann v. United States

Citation362 U.S. 214,4 L.Ed.2d 666,80 S.Ct. 629
Decision Date21 March 1960
Docket NumberNo. 153,153
PartiesClarence Duke McGANN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

Mr. Thomas Homer Davis, Austin, Tex., for petitioner.

Mr. Theodore G. Gilinsky, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari was improvidently granted and must be dismissed. When the case was brought here, on the meager documentation which so often is all that is presented by indigent prisoners seeking review on their own behalf, we assumed that a question involving the construction of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, called for adjudication. After argument, it became clear that the question of construction is not appropriately presented by the record because petitioner's claim upon the merits was fully considered and decided below, and we find his challenge of that action to be so insubstantial as not to have warranted bringing the case here.

Writ dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • State v. John W.
    • United States
    • Supreme Judicial Court of Maine (US)
    • August 25, 1980
    ...... Both article I, § 4 of the Maine Constitution and the first amendment of the United States Constitution protect the people against governmental encroachment on their freedom of ......
  • Rogers v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • June 17, 1981
    ...denial of due process,' so it is a violation of due process to convict and punish a man without evidence of his guilt. (362 U.S. 206, 80 S.Ct. 629, 4 L.Ed.2d 659.) Just as a defendant in a regular criminal proceeding is not accorded and afforded due process and due course of law in a regula......
  • Streetwatch v. National RR Passenger Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • February 21, 1995
    ....... NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. . No. 94 CIV 4254 (CBM). . United States District Court, S.D. New York. . February 21, 1995.         Center for ......
  • Spruytte v. Walters
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • January 28, 1985
    ......v. . Richard WALTERS and Ronald Schink, Defendants-Appellees. . No. 82-1676. . United States Court of Appeals, . Sixth Circuit. . Submitted Oct. 16, 1984. . Decided Jan. 28, 1985. . ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT