Gann v. United States
Citation | 362 U.S. 214,4 L.Ed.2d 666,80 S.Ct. 629 |
Decision Date | 21 March 1960 |
Docket Number | No. 153,153 |
Parties | Clarence Duke McGANN, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Mr. Thomas Homer Davis, Austin, Tex., for petitioner.
Mr. Theodore G. Gilinsky, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
The writ of certiorari was improvidently granted and must be dismissed. When the case was brought here, on the meager documentation which so often is all that is presented by indigent prisoners seeking review on their own behalf, we assumed that a question involving the construction of 28 U.S.C. § 2255, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, called for adjudication. After argument, it became clear that the question of construction is not appropriately presented by the record because petitioner's claim upon the merits was fully considered and decided below, and we find his challenge of that action to be so insubstantial as not to have warranted bringing the case here.
Writ dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. John W.
...... Both article I, § 4 of the Maine Constitution and the first amendment of the United States Constitution protect the people against governmental encroachment on their freedom of ......
-
Rogers v. State
...denial of due process,' so it is a violation of due process to convict and punish a man without evidence of his guilt. (362 U.S. 206, 80 S.Ct. 629, 4 L.Ed.2d 659.) Just as a defendant in a regular criminal proceeding is not accorded and afforded due process and due course of law in a regula......
-
Streetwatch v. National RR Passenger Corp.
....... NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. . No. 94 CIV 4254 (CBM). . United States District Court, S.D. New York. . February 21, 1995. Center for ......
-
Spruytte v. Walters
......v. . Richard WALTERS and Ronald Schink, Defendants-Appellees. . No. 82-1676. . United States Court of Appeals, . Sixth Circuit. . Submitted Oct. 16, 1984. . Decided Jan. 28, 1985. . ......