Gannett Co., Inc. v. Goldtrap, 74--99

CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtGRIMES; HOBSON, A.C.J., and BERANEK, JOHN R.
CitationGannett Co., Inc. v. Goldtrap, 302 So.2d 174 (Fla. App. 1974)
Decision Date25 October 1974
Docket NumberNo. 74--99,74--99
PartiesGANNETT CO., INC., d/b/a Fort Myers News-Press, Appellant, v. George GOLDTRAP et al., Appellees.

Steven Carta of Smith, Seals & Carta, Fort Myers, for appellant.

James T. Humphrey, County Atty., Fort Myers, for appellees.

GRIMES, Judge.

Appellant sought the issuance of an alternative writ of mandamus against the County Commissioners of Lee County and the County Administrator commanding them to allow the inspection of a written appraisal report obtained by the County in connection with negotiations for the proposed acquisition of property for a landfill site. Appellant contended that the appraisal report consisted of a public record which must be opened for the personal inspection of any citizen of Florida under § 119.01, F.S.A. The court below denied the petition.

At oral argument, counsel for the appellant conceded that the disclosure of the contents of the appraisal during the negotiations would be harmful to the County, but argued that this was irrelevant under the statute. We agree on both points.

There can be no doubt that the written appraisal report falls within the scope of 'public records' as defined in § 119.011(1), F.S.A. There is nothing in the statute to warrant the conclusion expressed by the judge that the appraisal would not become a 'public record' until the transaction had been completed.

In State ex rel. Copeland v. Cartwright, 1972, 38 F.Supp. 6, the circuit court held that a site plan review prepared for a public building project should be open for public inspection under the statute...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Dwyer, Application of
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 15, 1975
    ...autopsy reports (Denver Publishing Co. v. Dreyfus, 520 P.2d 104 (Sup.Ct.Colorado)), and written appraisal reports (Gannett Co., Inc. v. Goldtrap, 302 So.2d 174 (Fla.App.2d)) are Basically the intent throughout these, and the other cases relating to other types of information, is that the pu......
  • Douglas v. Michel
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 13, 1982
    ...See Rose v. D'Alessandro, 380 So.2d 419 (Fla.1980); Wait v. Florida Power & Light Co., 372 So.2d 420 (Fla.1979); Gannett Co. v. Goldtrap, 302 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). The context of section 119.07(3)(f) and its grammatical structure strongly indicate the Legislature intended no general......
  • News-Press Pub. Co., Inc. v. Gadd
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 5, 1980
    ...ex rel. Veale v. City of Boca Raton, 353 So.2d 1194 (Fla.4th DCA 1977), cert. denied, 360 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1978); Gannett Co., Inc. v. Goldtrap, 302 So.2d 174 (Fla.2d DCA 1974). Absent a statutory exemption, a court is not free to consider public policy questions regarding the relative signi......
  • Wisher v. News-Press Pub. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 1975
    ...report obtained by the county in connection with negotiations for the proposed acquisition of property. Gannett Co., Inc. v. Goldtrap, Fla.App.2nd, 1974, 302 So.2d 174. A preliminary site plan review prepared for a public building project has also been held subject to public inspection unde......
  • Get Started for Free