Garcia, In re

Decision Date16 December 1987
Citation838 F.2d 460
PartiesIn re Garcia (Oswald) NO. 87-1412
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

Fullam, J.

--- B.R. ----

AFFIRMED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • In re Garcia
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Third Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • 20 Julio 1988
  • Frenkel v. Frenkel
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 6 Diciembre 1991
    ...... It seems to us that when a client changes attorneys, the burden should rest with the client and his new attorney. [Id.].         Some courts have carved out exceptions to the attorney's right to retain a client's file under a common law retaining lien. See, e.g. In re Garcia, 76 B.R. 68, 69 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987), aff'd sub nom., Appeal of Clark, Ladner, Fortenbaugh & Young, 838 F.2d 459 (1987) and 838 F.2d 460 (1987) and sub nom. New World Mktg. Corp. v. Garcia, 838 F.2d 462 (1987) (exception "where some fundamental right of the client would be impaired by recognizing ......
  • In re Duque, 90-2109-CIV.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Florida
    • 11 Octubre 1991
    ......872, 874 (Bankr.N.D.Ill. 1983) (balancing "the benefit of the information against the burden of production"). This balancing of benefits against burdens calls for the court to consider, inter alia, whether the information is necessary and unavailable from any other source. See In re Garcia, 76 B.R. 68, 69 (E.D.Pa.) (affirming denial of motion to quash in part because subpoenaed lawfirm records "relevant and not available from any other source") (emphasis added), aff'd, 838 F.2d 460 (3d Cir.1987); In re National Trade Corp., 28 B.R. at 875 (recognizing relevance of information ......
  • Maleski by Chronister v. Corporate Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
    • 22 Marzo 1994
    ...... Even if the document retrieval provisions . Page 11. of the Act did not supersede retaining liens, the equitable nature of such a lien would dictate that it be superseded in the face of an overriding public policy. In re: Garcia, 69 B.R. 522 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 76 B.R. 68 (E.D.Pa.), Aff'd without opinion, 838 F.2d 460 (3d Cir.1987). In enacting the liquidation provisions of the Act, the General Assembly sought to protect the public and policyholders from an insolvent insurer through giving the statutory liquidator the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT