Garcia-Manriquez v. State, 3D13–2814.

Decision Date03 September 2014
Docket NumberNo. 3D13–2814.,3D13–2814.
Citation146 So.3d 134 (Mem)
PartiesBlas GARCIA–MANRIQUEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, EMAS and FERNANDEZ, JJ.

Opinion

WELLS, Judge.

Blas Garcia–Manriquez appeals from a final judgment of conviction and sentence entered following a guilty plea. He claims that the court below erred in accepting a plea with which he did not entirely agree. Because the issue was not presented to the trial court in a timely motion to withdraw his plea, we are without jurisdiction to consider this claim:

Generally, to obtain appellate review of a plea of guilty or no contest, the defendant must specifically reserve dispositive issues for appeal or file a motion to withdraw the plea in the trial court. Burns v. State, 884 So.2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). Following a guilty or no contest plea, a defendant may appeal only the trial court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction; a violation of a plea agreement, if preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea; an involuntary plea, if preserved by a motion to withdraw the plea; and a sentencing error, if preserved. Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A) ; Liebman v. State, 853 So.2d 514, 515 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003).
... An issue relating to the voluntary and intelligent nature of the plea falls within the limited class of issues which a defendant may raise on appeal from a guilty or no contest plea without having specifically reserved the right to do so. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898, 902 (Fla.1979) ; Burns, 884 So.2d at 1013. However, before raising such an issue on appeal, the defendant must first file a motion to withdraw the plea with the trial court. Because Hicks failed to do so, we lack jurisdiction to consider his
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Dortch v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 4 Abril 2018
    ...We certify conflict with the First, Third, and Fifth District Courts of Appeal in Pressley v. State , 227 So.3d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017), Garcia–Manriquez , and Hicks .Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The trial court may determine the defendant's co......
  • State v. Dortch
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 20 Mayo 2021
    ...Fourth District certified conflict with the decisions in Pressley v. State , 227 So. 3d 573 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; Garcia-Manriquez v. State , 146 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ; and Hicks v. State , 915 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). We accepted jurisdiction to resolve the conflict.II.On t......
  • Campbell v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 13 Marzo 2020
    ...; Hammonds v. State , 275 So. 3d 797 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019) ; Murphy v. State , 181 So. 3d 574 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015) ; Garcia-Manriquez v. State , 146 So. 3d 134 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014) ; but see Dortch v. State , 242 So. 3d 431, 433 (Fla. 4th DCA) (receding from the position that a criminal defendan......
  • Nivia v. Aurora Loan Servs., LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 3 Septiembre 2014

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT