Garcia-Tunon v. Garcia-Tunon, GARCIA-TUNO
| Decision Date | 31 July 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 84-2703,A,GARCIA-TUNO,M,84-2703 |
| Citation | 472 So.2d 1378,10 Fla. L. Weekly 1860 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1860 Estherppellant, v. Josearta Gonzalez and Rosa Maria Urreta, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jay W. Fusco of Meros & Smith, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.
Arnoldo Velez and Maria C. Arriola Velez of Taylor, Brion, Buker & Greene, Miami, for appellees.
This appeal poses the question of whether a life tenant can partition Florida real property against the remaindermen.
Appellant is the surviving spouse of Jose N. Garcia-Tunon, who died intestate on February 5, 1979. Appellees are the decedent's grown-up children by a prior marriage. The surviving spouse filed a complaint against decedent's children for partition of certain real property owned by her deceased husband. She alleged that upon her husband's death, she acquired a life estate in the property, and the children received a vested remainder. The trial court granted the children's motion for summary judgment, and this appeal ensued.
Partition was originally developed by the English common law as a remedy available to coparceners. Later, the right was extended to joint tenants and tenants in common. Thereafter, partition became an equitable remedy under English law and has been so considered in the United States. See generally, 2A R. Powell, Powell on Real Property § 289 (1981). The original purpose of partition was to permit cotenants to avoid the inconvenience or dissension arising from sharing joint possession of real estate. L. Simes & A. Smith, The Law of Future Interests § 1764 (2d ed. 1956).
Partition is now provided for and regulated by statute in almost every state. 4 G. Thompson, Thompson on Real Property § 1822 (1979). The general rule, in the absence of a statute to the contrary, is that a life tenant cannot maintain partition against the remaindermen. Thompson, § 1824. In Florida a partition action is governed by section 64.031, Florida Statutes (1983), which provides that "the action may be filed by one or more of several joint tenants, tenants in common, or coparceners, against their cotenants, coparceners, or others interested in the lands to be divided."
The Florida statute has been narrowly construed. For example, in Weed v. Knox, 157 Fla. 896, 27 So.2d 419 (Fla.1946), the supreme court held that one remainderman is not entitled to partition against the other where there is an outstanding life estate, because such a right of partition is not specifically granted by statute.
Section 64.031 refers to joint ownership of lands to be partitioned. Here, appellant alleges that she is a life tenant in the entire real property. She does not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
1996 -NMSC- 78, Sims v. Sims
...to avoid the inconvenience and dissension caused by the inharmonious joint possession of the property. Garcia-Tunon v. Garcia-Tunon, 472 So.2d 1378, 1378 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1985). Furthermore, partition "is based upon the principle that no one can be compelled to hold property with another, a......
-
Barden v. Pappas
...presented. The trial continued, resulting in a final judgment of partition, from which Barden appeals. In Garcia-Tunon v. Garcia-Tunon, 472 So.2d 1378, 1379 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), the court noted Partition was originally developed by the English common law as a remedy available to coparceners.......
- Becker v. Becker
-
Becker v. Becker
...on either the process server's failure to identify the recipient, or failure to explain the contents of the papers served. See Montano, 472 So. 2d at 1378 (reversing trial court order and quashing service where process server failed to identify recipient of service); see also Bache, Halsey,......
-
PROPERTY LAW FOR THE AGES.
...1994); Scottish Rite of Indianapolis Found., Inc. v. Adams, 834 N.E.2d 1024,1027 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005); Garcia-Tunon v. Garcia-Tunon, 472 So. 2d 1378, 1379 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. (198.) See, e.g., Fehringer v. Fehringer, 367 S.W.2d 781, 784 (Tenn. 1963); Hayden v. McNamee, 63 N.E.2d 876, 882 (......
-
The impact of co-ownership on Florida homestead.
...[section] 64.031 (2011) (Only permits joint tenants, tenants in common, and coparcencers to partition); Garcia-Tunon v. Garcia-Tunon, 472 So. 2d 1378, 1379 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1985) (held "that a partition action is not available to an owner of a life estate seeking to partition against remaind......
-
The new homestead trap: surviving spouses are trapped by life estates they no longer want and can no longer afford.
...738.701(3). (3) Id. (4) Fla. Stat. [section] 738.701(4). (5) Fla. Stat. [section] 738.801(2). (6) Garcia-Tunon v. Garcia-Tunon, 472 So. 2d 1378 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1985); Barden v. Pappas, 532 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. Jeffrey A. Baskies is a partner in the Ft. Lauderdale office of Ruden McCl......