Garfield County v. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance

Docket Number20150335
Decision Date26 July 2017
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
17 cases
  • Rutherford v. Talisker Canyons Fin., Co.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • June 27, 2019
    ...clear statutory text on the ground that "no rational legislator could possibly have intended" such an application. Garfield Cty. v. United States , 2017 UT 41, ¶ 23 n.55, 424 P.3d 46. But that is not what the majority is doing here. It is not saying that the circumstance before us in this c......
  • GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • September 12, 2018
    ... ... : INTRODUCTION 1 This case comes to us on certification from the United States District Court for the District of Utah. See UTAH R. APP ... P. 41 ... ; as such, traditional standards of review do not apply." Garfield Cty. v. United States , 2017 UT 41, 6, 424 P.3d 46 (citation omitted) ... ...
  • Zilleruelo v. Commodity Transporters, Inc.
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • January 20, 2022
    ..., 890 P.2d 1017, 1020 (Utah 1995) (quoting Hanchett v. Burbidge , 59 Utah 127, 202 P. 377, 379–80 (1921) ); see also Garfield Cnty. v. United States , 2017 UT 41, ¶ 15, 424 P.3d 46 ("In general, ‘[w]here a statute's language is unambiguous and provides a workable result, we need not resort ......
  • Vineyard Props. of Utah LLC v. RLS Constr. LLC
    • United States
    • Utah Court of Appeals
    • December 30, 2021
    ...realty upon which the work was performed, including all the "sticks" in the proverbial "bundle" of property rights. See Garfield County v. United States , 2017 UT 41, ¶ 18 n.47, 424 P.3d 46 (referring to "real property" as "the numerous rights and privileges attendant to ownership of proper......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT