Garfield v. Elmwood Stores

Decision Date10 January 1952
Docket NumberNo. C--485,C--485
PartiesGARFIELD et al. v. ELMWOOD STORES, Inc. et al.
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court

John J. Clancy, Newark, for plaintiffs.

Edward J. Gilhooly, Newark, for defendants (Gilhooly, Yauch & Fagan, Newark, attorneys).

FREUND, J.S.C.

The plaintiffs, real estate brokers, have filed a complaint in 12 counts, the first nine of which allege that the defendant, Elmwood Stores, Inc., a corporation of New Jersey, is indebted to them for commissions by reason of services rendered in the procurement of leases for property about to be constructed by Elmwood Stores, Inc., on Route 4, Broadway, East Paterson, New Jersey and to be known as 'Elmwood Shopping Center.' The tenth and eleventh counts assert a similar claim for commissions against the defendants, E. Robert Coven and Harry Haines. The aggregate claim for commissions amounts to $152,756, for which the plaintiffs claim judgment against the defendant, Elmwood Stores, Inc., on the nine counts against it, and for the identical amount on the claim against the individual defendants on the two counts against them.

The twelfth count seeks a lien for the amount claimed to be due on the lands and premises owned by Elmwood Stores, Inc., and a restraint against the said corporation and the individual defendants, who are officers and directors of the corporation, from conveying title to the premises or encumbering them. The basis for the claim for a lien and a restraint are the following allegations of the twelfth count:

'Plaintiffs are informed and believe that the only asset owned by the defendant, Elmwood Stores, Inc., is the land and the building thereon now in the course of construction which comprises the shopping center for which plaintiffs obtained the tenants set forth in Counts First to Eighth of this complaint. * * *

'Plaintiffs are apprehensive that if the said defendant, Elmwood Stores, Inc., conveys or further encumbers its sole asset that they will be irreparably injured; that the defendants would be unjustly enriched by availing themselves of the fruits of the plaintiffs' labor without paying for the same or making any provision to secure payment to plaintiffs prior to and in preference to the right of any purchaser of the said lands and premises. Plaintiffs allege that if said asset be sold or further encumbered plaintiffs will be deprived and defrauded of their right to look to said corporate asset for a recovery on any judgment which they may obtain in this suit, and that such judgment would, therefore, be worthless, and they request this Court to enjoin the defendants, Harry Haines, E. Robert Coven and Elmwood Stores, Inc., its officers and directors from conveying the said property until this suit has been determined and to further enjoin the said defendants, Harry Haines, E. Robert Coven and Elmwood Stores, Inc., its officers and directors, agents or employees, from doing or committing any act which will further encumber the said lands and premises owned by the defendant, Elmwood Stores, Inc., until the full and complete determination of this cause. * * *'

The plaintiffs have filed a notice of Lis pendens in the office of the clerk of the County of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • B. J. I. Corp. v. Larry W. Corp.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • 14. Januar 1982
    ...lis pendens shall be filed under this article in an action to recover a judgment for money or damages only. Garfield v. Elmwood Stores, 17 N.J.Super. 513, 86 A.2d 308 (Ch.Div.1952); Grabowski v. S. & N. Constr. Co., Inc., 72 N.J.Super. 1, 177 A.2d 576 Although title to the lot was in Larry ......
  • Noyes v. Cohen's Estate
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • 30. März 1973
    ...to file a lis pendens she would have placed herself in jeopardy of a suit for removal of the lis pendens. Garfield v. Elmwood Stores, Inc., 17 N.J.Super. 513, 86 A.2d 308 (Ch.Div.1952); Grabowski v. S & E Construction Co., Inc., 72 N.J.Super. 1, 177 A.2d 576 N.J.S.A. 2A:26--1 provides that ......
  • General Elec. Credit Corp. v. Winnebago of New Jersey, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court — Appellate Division
    • 28. März 1977
    ...Div. 1973); Grabowski v. S. & E. Constr. Co., Inc., 72 N.J.Super. 1, 177 A.2d 576 (Ch. Div. 1962), and Garfield v. Elmwood Stores, Inc., 17 N.J.Super. 513, 86 A.2d 308 (Ch. Div. 1952), concluded that a plaintiff must have an existing lien before N.J.S.A. 2A:15--6 becomes * * * N.J.S.A. 2A:1......
  • Grabowski v. S & E Const. Co.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court
    • 24. Januar 1962
    ...or title to land. Under our statute, a lis pendens filed in such an action is a nullity.' In the case of Garfield v. Elmwood Stores, Inc., 17 N.J.Super. 513, 86 A.2d 308 (Ch.Div.1952), Judge Freund ruled that a Lis pendens was improperly filed. In the Garfield case plaintiffs, who were real......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT