Garner v. Southern Pulpwood Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 28 January 1963 |
Docket Number | No. 736,736 |
Citation | 149 So.2d 157 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Parties | Willie GARNER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOUTHERN PULPWOOD INSURANCE CO., Defendant-Appellee. |
John P. Godfrey and Thomas A. Self, Many, for plaintiff-appellant.
Hall & Coltharp, by L. H. Coltharp, Jr., DeRidder, for defendant-appellee.
Before FRUGE , SAVOY and CULPEPPER, JJ.
This is a suit for workmen's compensation by plaintiff against Foster Forest Products, Inc. and its compensation insurer, Southern Pulpwood Insurance Co. arising out of an alleged injury sustained on or about September 14, 1960. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of defendants, dismissing plaintiff's suit, and he has appealed to this court.
There are three principal issues presented by this appeal. First, what was the relationship between plaintiff and Foster Forest Products, Inc., i.e., was it a relationship of principal and contractor, employer and employee, or buyer and seller? Second, did plaintiff receive injuries within the meaning of the workmen's compensation act? Third, what is the extent of plaintiff's disability?
The trial court in dismissing plaintiff's suit resolved the first issue by finding that a vendor-vendee relationship existed between plaintiff and Foster Forest Products, Inc. It therefore had no occasion to consider the other issues. Accordingly, we may also abstain from ruling on the remaining issues if we reach the same conclusion as the trial court.
The record discloses that defendant, Foster Forest Products, Inc., is a pulpwood producer and broker. At times it uses its own crew to cut pulpwood on tracts that it owns, or on tracts of land where it has purchased timber. However, it also purchases pulpwood from individuals at a set price per cord delivered to its mill.
The trial judge, in his written reasons, succinctly set forth his appreciation of the facts surrounding the relationship between plaintiff and Foster Forest Products, Inc. as follows:
(Tr. 309).
Upon further examination of the record, we note that Mr. Cole was certain that he never entered into a buy and sell agreement with Foster. Indeed, the evidence adduced at the trial of this case convinces us that title to the timber cut by Grady Williams and plaintiff did not vest in Foster until it was delivered to his mill. Further support for this conclusion is established by the fact that all of the timber cut by Grady Williams and plaintiff was not removed and delivered to Foster Forest Products, Inc.; nor was Foster Forest Products, Inc. required to pay for the timber cut but not picked up and hauled away. Certainly, if Mr. Cole and Foster had entered into an agreement whereby the latter was to pay for all timber cut on a stumpage basis, demand would have been made for such payment. Therefore, in our opinion, the timber was being cut and removed at the time of plaintiff's injury under an agreement entered into by Mr. Cole and Grady Williams. Accordingly, we find no manifest error in the trial judge's determination that the relationship between plaintiff and Foster was that...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bryant v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
...seller or his employees. Taylor v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company, 220 La. 995, 58 So.2d 206; Garner v. Southern Pulpwood Insurance Co., La.App. 3 Cir., 149 So.2d 157; Dunn v. Southern Pulpwood Insurance Company, La.App. 2 Cir., 141 So.2d 882; Benton v. Pope, La.App. 1 Cir., 1......
-
Redding v. Cade
...Continental and Cade was only that of buyer and seller, Continental's able counsel relies upon cases such as Garner v. Southern Pulpwood Insurance Co., La.App. 3 Cir., 149 So.2d 157, Benton v. Pope, La.App. 1 Cir., 130 So.2d 724, Smith v. American Employers Insurance Co., La.App. 2 Cir., 13......
-
Collier v. Southern Cas. Ins. Co.
...La.App. 3 Cir., 163 So.2d 119; Bryant v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App. 3 Cir., 163 So.2d 95; Garner v. Southern Pulpwood Ins. Co., La.App. 3 Cir., 149 So.2d 157. Relying upon the latter line of decisions, counsel for Forest Products and Southern Casualty urges that neither ......
-
Stillman v. Jim Walter Corp.
... ... Carpenter v. Madden, La.App., 90 So.2d 508 (1956). And in Garner v. Southern Pulpwood Ins. Co., La.App., 149 So.2d 157 (1963), the court ... ...