Garrett v. Board of Commissioners of Boone County
Decision Date | 18 December 1883 |
Docket Number | 10,763 |
Citation | 92 Ind. 518 |
Parties | Garrett v. The Board of Commissioners of Boone County |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Petition for a Rehearing Overruled Jan. 9, 1884.
From the Boone Circuit Court.
Judgment reversed, at appellee's costs, with instruction to sustain the appellant's motion for a new trial.
C. S Wesner and T. W. Lockhart, for appellant.
W. R Stokes, for appellee.
The appellant filed before the board of commissioners of Boone county an account for services while recorder of that county, in making two general indexes of deeds and mortgages which had been recorded by his predecessor in office.His account not being allowed, he appealed to the circuit court, where the case was tried by the court.There was a finding for the appellee, and, over the appellant's motion for a new trial, judgment was rendered upon the finding.
The undisputed facts proved at the trial were as follows:
The appellant was recorder of Boone county, by appointment, from June 30th, 1879, to some time in October, 1880, He succeeded William F. Morgan, who died while in office.Morgan made no general index of deeds recorded by him in deed records numbered 25, 26, 27 and 28, nor any general index of mortgages recorded by him in mortgage records numbered 13, 14, 15 and 16, and there was no general index of the deeds or mortgages recorded as aforesaid when the appellant came into office.While the appellant was in office he made general indexes for said deeds and mortgages, being general index of deeds No. 7 and general index of mortgages No. 4.The appellant also made general indexes of all deeds and mortgages recorded by himself while holding the office.
The following sections of acts of the Legislature of 1852 and 1855, being sections of the Revised Statutes of 1881, as below numbered, govern, we think, the case under consideration:
5938.
5939."Each recorder is further authorized and required, as aforesaid, to make out a complete or general index to all the records of mortgages upon real estate in his office, in manner and form as prescribed in the foregoing section for deeds, excepting that the headings therein prescribed shall be so changed as to suit mortgages."
5940."After the completion of the indexes contemplated by the last two preceding sections, each recorder shall, from time to time, upon filling a record of deeds or mortgages, include the same in the complete or general indexes as aforesaid."
5941."The board doing county business shall allow the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Robison v. Fishback
...v. Flynn, 161 Ind. 554, 69 N. E. 159;Board v. Mitchell, 131 Ind. 370, 30 N. E. 409, 15 L. R. A. 520;Hoffman v. Board, 96 Ind. 84;Garrett v. Board, 92 Ind. 518;Hubler v. Board, 19 Ind. App. 464, 49 N. E. 832. It has been held that an index is simply a facility for learning the contents of a ......
-
People's Savings Bank v. Big Rock Stone & Construction Co.
...A contract is not absolutely void between two corporations because some of the directors of the two are common to both. 33 L. R. A. 788; 92 Ind. 518. 2. contract is not void as against public policy, but in any case appellees can not complain. Only parties to a contract void or voidable as ......
-
Castle v. Bannock County
... ... OF PHYSICIAN BY COUNTY-INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF BOARD NOT ... AUTHORIZED.-An individual member of the board of county ... Boards ... of county commissioners are entireties and can only act ... collectively and as empowered by law ... Clark, 4 Ind ... 315; Hoffman v. Board, 96 Ind. 84; Garrett v ... Board, 92 Ind. 518; Boggs v. Caldwell, 28 Mo. 586.) ... ...
-
The Board of Commissioners of Tippecanoe County v. Mitchell
... ... adjudged. Board, etc., v. Weeks, 130 Ind ... 162, 29 N.E. 776; Hoffman v. Board, etc., ... 96 Ind. 84; Garrett v. Board, etc., 92 Ind ... 518; Boggs v. Caldwell County, 28 Mo. 586 ... To the class of cases represented by those just named this ... case ... ...