Garrison v. California
Decision Date | 13 March 1967 |
Docket Number | M,No. 664,664 |
Citation | 87 S.Ct. 1042,18 L.Ed.2d 51,386 U.S. 286 |
Parties | Jimmie GARRISON v. CALIFORNIA. isc |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the District Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case remanded for further consideration in light of Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824.
Mr. Justice STEWART would grant certiorari and reverse the judgment for the reasons stated in his opinion concurring in the result in Chapman v. State of California, 386 U.S., at 42, 87 S.Ct., at 837.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sibron v. State of New York Peters v. State of New York
... ... Page 61 ... law of search and seizure to meet the needs of local law enforcement, see Ker v. State of California, 374 U.S. 23, 34, 83 S.Ct. 1623, 1630, 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963), and in the process it may call the standards it employs by any names it may choose. It ... ...
- People v. Morales
-
People v. Taggart
... ... State of California, 374 U.S. 23, 34--35, 83 S.Ct. 1623, 10 L.Ed.2d 726; Johnson v. United States, 333 U.S. 10, 13--14, 68 S.Ct. 367, 92 L.Ed. 436). To tolerate ... ...
-
State v. Dilley
... ... Compare the comment by Justice Black in Cooper v. State of California,[231 A.2d 358] 386 U.S. 58, 87 S.Ct. 788, 17 L.Ed.2d 730, 733 (1967) that it would be unreasonable to hold that the police could not search a car ... ...