Garrity v. People of State

Decision Date30 September 1873
CitationGarrity v. People of State , 70 Ill. 83, 1873 WL 8551 (Ill. 1873)
PartiesHUGH GARRITYv.THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

WRIT OF ERROR to the Criminal Court of Cook county; the Hon. JOHN G. ROGERS, Judge, presiding.

Mr. JOHN LYLE KING, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. JUSTICE SCOTT delivered the opinion of the Court:

Plaintiff in error and Charles Weed were indicted for an assault upon Benjamin G. Buchanan with intent to commit robbery. At a subsequent term of the court Garrity was separately tried, and the jury found him guilty, and fixed the time he should serve in the penitentiary at the period of six years. The court overruled the motion for a new trial, and pronounced judgment on the verdict, and that decision is assigned for error.

After a careful consideration, we are of opinion, all the members of the court concurring, that the evidence fails to sustain the verdict. There is no direct testimony, and it seems to us the record is singularly barren of evidence of facts and circumstances from which it could fairly be inferred the party accused intended to commit a crime of the character charged in the indictment. There is no doubt he was guilty of an assault, but not with an intent to commit the crime alleged. It was simply an assault characterized, perhaps, by a high degree of wantonness, for which the parties accused ought to have been punished. But the time, place and facts of the transaction, as given in evidence by the several witnesses, all repel the idea there was any intention whatever to commit a robbery on the person of Buchanan. He states it was a little before nine o'clock in the evening, while the street lights were still burning, the gas burning in the adjoining stores, and persons passing so near that some of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • People v. White
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • June 1, 1977
    ...290 Ill. 603, 125 N.E. 256; People v. O'Connor, 310 Ill. 403, 141 N.E. 748; People v. Williams, 23 Ill.2d 295, 178 N.E.2d 372. In Garrity v. People, 70 Ill. 83, and People v. McLaughlin, 337 Ill. 259, 169 N.E. 206, the defendants were charged with assault with intent to rob. Although in eac......
  • People v. Kuhn, 12885.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • February 4, 1920
    ...each defendant guilty in manner and form as charged in the first count of the indictment, and reliance is placed on the cases of Garrity v. People, 70 Ill. 83, and Turley v. People, 188 Ill. 628, 59 N. E. 506, as holding that the manner and form charged in the indictment related only to the......
  • People v. Bonner
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • September 9, 1963
    ...178, 197 N.E. 531.' People v. Perry, 23 Ill.2d 147 154, 177 N.E.2d 323, 327. Turley v. People, 188 Ill. 628, 59 N.E. 506, and Garrity v. People, 70 Ill. 83, relied on by defendant, are, in our opinion, distinguishable on the facts. The facts in the case at bar, as testified to by the police......
  • Barnett v. Wolf
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • September 30, 1873
    ... ... If the service itself was defective, so that the return can not be amended and state the truth, the court should refuse to proceed in the case until there is new and proper service, or ... ...