Gaspard v. Grain Dealers Mut. Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 19 June 1961 |
Docket Number | No. 298,298 |
Citation | 131 So.2d 831 |
Parties | Andrus GASPARD, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of His Minor Son, Ronnie Gaspard, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GRAIN DEALERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendant and Appellee. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Edwards & Edwards, by Nolan J. Edwards, Crowley, for plaintiff-appellant.
Mouton, Champagne & Colomb, by George J. Champagne, Jr., Lafayette, for defendants-appellees.
Before HOOD, FRUGE and CULPEPPER, JJ.
This is a suit brought by Andrus Gaspard, individually and as administrator of the estate of his minor son, Ronnie Gaspard, for damages for personal injuries received when the said minor was struck on the head by a baseball bat which slipped from the hands of Ronald Viator, minor son of the defendant, Alfred Viator, while the two minors were participating in a game of baseball during the recess period of a summer catechism school. Defendant, Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company, is the insurer of Mr. Viator under a comprehensive liability policy. The defendants deny any negligence on the part of Ronald Viator and specially plead assumption of the risk as a bar to plaintiff's recovery. In the alternative, defendants allege contributory negligence on the part of Ronnie Gaspard. From an adverse judgment in the lower court plaintiff has taken this appeal.
The facts of the accident are set forth in the lower court's written opinion as follows:
bench situated to the left and a little bit behind the batter, some twelve or fifteen feet distant in the act of stooping to select his own bat, as he was next in line at the plate. Viator swung at a pitched ball, missed it, and the bat slipped from his hands, flying through the air and striking young Gaspard on the head. * * *
The first issue is the negligence of Ronald Viator who was twelve years old at the time of the accident. Plaintiff relies principally on the case of Polk v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, La.App. 2 Cir., 1959, 115 So.2d 399 in which two boys, approximately ten years of age, were playing 'flys and rollers' in the backyard of a home where three little four year old girls were also playing. As one of the boys was swinging the bat, plaintiff's little girl moved toward him and was struck in the face. In finding the boy negligent, the court held that he was aware of the presence of the little girls and of the possibility of injury to them and should have taken the precaution of noting their whereabouts before swinging the bat, because he should have known that the actions of four year olds could not be anticipated.
In our opinion the trial judge was correct in finding the Polk case has no application here. Although plaintiff urges that the Polk case indicates a baseball batter is negligent in not watching out for other children in the course of batting, the facts of the present case indicate that the Viator boy was aware of the presence of young Gaspard and the other boys approximately fifteen feet to his left rear, but whether Viator was or was not aware of the presence of Gaspard, this had no causal relation to the accident. The accident here was caused by the bat slipping from Viator's hands, and not by his being unmindful of the presence of Gaspard. Other obvious reasons why the Polk case is inapplicable here are that the Po...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Knight v. Jewett
...defendant baserunner's hard slide into second base during a family picnic softball game. Similarly, in Gaspard v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Company (La.Ct.App.1961) 131 So.2d 831, the plaintiff baseball player was denied recovery when he was struck on the head by a bat which accidental......
-
Tavernier v. Maes
...of the game.' (Prosser, op. cit., p. 103; and in addition to the authorities cited by the author see Gaspard v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. (La.App.1961) 131 So.2d 831, 834 (flying bat); McLeod Store v. Vinson (1926) 213 Ky. 667, 281 S.W. 799 (scramble for guinea hens released in sto......
-
Kabella v. Bouschelle
....... A number of other jurisdictions prohibit recovery generally for reasons of public policy. (E.g. Gaspard v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance Co. (La.App.1961), 131 So.2d 831.)" 334 N.E.2d at 260. See also Annot. 7 A.L.R.2d 704 (1949). Recent cases involving damage claims sounding in tort ......
-
Niemczyk v. Burleson
...sued another player for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff during the course of the game include Gaspard v. Grain Dealers Mut. Ins. Co., 131 So.2d 831 (La.App.1961); Bendetto v. Travelers Ins. Co., 172 So.2d 354 (La.App.1965); Tavernier v. Maes, 242 Cal.App.2d 532, 51 Cal.Rptr. 57......