Gass v. Carducci

Decision Date22 December 1964
Docket NumberGen. No. 49424
Citation52 Ill.App.2d 394,203 N.E.2d 289
PartiesAnna M. GASS and George W. Gass, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Marilyn CARDUCCI, Defendant, and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a Corporation, Garnishee-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Querrey, Harrow, Gulanick & Kennedy, Chicago, John T. Kennedy, Chicago, of counsel for garnishee-appellant.

John G. Phillips, Chicago, for plaintiffs-appellees, Anna M. Gass and George W. Gass.

Orner & Wasserman, Chicago, John G. Phillips and Norton Wasserman, Chicago, of counsel for defendant-appellee, Marilyn Carducci.

BURKE, Presiding Justice.

Appellees filed a motion in this court on November 20, 1964 to modify and clarify an opinion filed by this court on October 27, 1964, General Number 49424. Jurisdiction of this court in this matter is predicated upon Ill.Rev.Stat.1963, Chap. 77, Pars. 82, 83 & 84, which permits the filing of a motion to vacate or modify any judgment, order or decree within 30 days of its rendition.

Appellees suggest that the part of the opinion affirming the judgment in favor of Anna M. Gass and reading 'The judgment for $25,000, with interest thereon from May 4, 1961, in favor of Anna M. Gass and against the garnishee, is affirmed * * *' be modified to read 'The garnishment judgment in favor of Anna M. Gass for $25,000, with interest from May 4, 1961 on the entire judgment of $50,000 against the garnishee's insured, is affirmed * * *,' in accordance with the judgment of the trial court.

The garnishee's contract of insurance reads in part:

'* * * As respects the insurance afforded by the other terms of this policy under coverages A and B the company shall: * * * pay all expenses incurred by the company, all costs taxed against the insured in any such suit and all interest accruing after entry of judgment until the company has paid, tendered or deposited in court such part of such judgment as does not exceed the limit of the company's liability thereon; * * *.'

The Illinois Supreme Court, interpreting an insurance contract clasue consisting of wording indentical to the above provision in the case of River Valley Cartage Co., Inc., v. Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co., 17 Ill.2d 242, 161 N.E.2d 101, 76 A.L.R.2d 878, held that such wording obligated the insurance company to pay interest on the entire judgment rendered against its insured, rather than merely on that part of the judgment for which the insurance company...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • July 17, 1984
    ...Ins. Co. v. Ball, 127 Cal.App.3d 568, 570-571, 179 Cal.Rptr. 644 (1981); Gass v. Carducci, 52 Ill.App.2d 394, 402, 202 N.E.2d 73, 203 N.E.2d 289 (1964); Travelers Indem. Co. v. Cornelsen, 272 Md. 48, 51, 321 A.2d 149 (1974); Lumbermens' Mut. Casualty Co. v. Yeroyan, 90 N.H. 145, 146, 5 A.2d......
  • Pacific Indem. Co. v. Interstate Fire & Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • September 1, 1984
    ... ... Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hodges, 221 Ga. 355, 144 S.E.2d 723 (1965) (consortium); Gass723 (1965) (consortium); Gass v. Carducci ... ...
  • Allegheny Airlines, Inc. v. Forth Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • November 9, 1981
    ...400 (Fla.), cert. dismissed, 238 So.2d 427 (1970); Gass v. Carducci, 52 Ill.App.2d 394, 202 N.E.2d 73, supp. op. 52 Ill.App. 402 A, 203 N.E.2d 289 (1964); Stamps v. Consolidated Underwriters, 208 Kan. 630, 493 P.2d 246 (1972); Pittman v. Fowler, 191 So.2d 172 (La.App.1966); Re Estate of Tic......
  • Green v. J.C. Penney Auto Ins. Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • November 25, 1986
    ...in part on other grounds sub nom. Murphy v. Urso, 88 Ill.2d 444, 58 Ill.Dec. 828, 430 N.E.2d 1079 (1981); Gass v. Carducci, 52 Ill.App.2d 394, 402b, 203 N.E.2d 289, 290 (1st Dist.1964); cf. Allegheny Airlines v. Forth Corp., 663 F.2d 751, 755-756 (7th Cir.1981) (reaches same result under In......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT