Gaut v. City of Southfield
Decision Date | 30 August 1972 |
Docket Number | No. 7,7 |
Citation | 200 N.W.2d 76,388 Mich. 189 |
Parties | Merlin GAUT et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF SOUTHFIELD, a Michigan corporation, Defendant-Appellee. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
James E. Wells, Detroit, for plaintiffs and appellants.
Sigmund A. Beras, Southfield, City Atty., Southfield, for appellee.
Before the Entire Bench.
This action was commenced in the circuit court for Oakland County for a declaratory judgment invalidating a special assessment for sewer construction.
The gist of the action is that plaintiff property owners, and others similarly situated, have been denied The right to veto the construction of the sewer, pursuant to an ordinance of the City of Southfield, and further that they have been denied the opportunity to be heard before the City Council on the necessity for the improvement as required by ordinance.
Finally, plaintiffs claim that if they are not entitled to such hearing, the entire special assessment procedure is invalid as violating the equal protection clauses of State and Federal Constitutions.
Both parties sought summary judgment in circuit court. Defendant prevailed, and the summary judgment in defendant's favor was affirmed by the Court of Appeals, 34 Mich.App. 646, 192 N.W.2d 123.
The sewer involved is formally designated Sanitary Lateral System #7. Construction of the sewer has long since been completed, and presumably, the sewer is now in operation.
There is no dispute that the sewer was constructed by the County of Oakland through its Department of Public Works, under contract with the City of Southfield. Statutory authority for such an arrangement is contained in M.C.L.A. § 123.742; M.S.A. § 5.570(12); and M.C.L.A § 123.743; M.S.A. § 5.570(13). These statutes provide:
'(a) By service charges to users of the system or lake improvements.
'(b) By special assessment upon lands benefited.
'(c) By the exaction of charges for the connection of properties, directly or indirectly, to the system.
'(d) By setting aside any state collected funds disbursed to the municipality and usable therefor.
'(e) By setting aside any other available moneys.
Chapter 2 of the Act, referenced in section 13 above, provides in part as follows:
M.C.L.A. § 123.752; M.S.A. § 5.570(22).
M.C.L.A. § 123.754; M.S.A. § 5.570(24).
The ordinance of the defendant City governing special assessments is No. 147. It contains these provisions:
'Proceedings for the making of local public improvements within the City may be commenced by resolution of the Council, on its own initiative or by an initiatory petition signed by property owners whose aggregate property in the special assessment district was assessed for not less than 60% Of the total assessed value of the privately owned real property located therein, in accordance with the last preceding general assessment roll; Provided However, that in the case of special assessments for paving or similar improvements which are normally assessed on a frontage basis against abutting property, such petitions shall be signed by the owners of not less than 60% Of the frontage property to be assessed.
'Such petitions shall contain in addition to the signatures of the owners, a brief description of the property owned by the respective signers thereof.
'Such petitions shall be verified by the affidavit of one or more of the owners or by some...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Culkin
... ... 27, 1997, a police officer responding to a disturbance in a residential area of `Aiea, in the City and County of Honolulu, encountered Jayne Suarez ("Suarez") kneeling in front of a house and Culkin ... ...
-
State v. Doleszny
... ... Iowa Methodist Med. Ctr., 293 N.W.2d 550, 556 (Iowa 1980) ; Transit Auth. of River City v. Montgomery, 836 S.W.2d 413, 416 (Ky.1992) ; Commonwealth v. Britto, 433 Mass. 596, 744 N.E.2d ... ...
-
People v. Charles
... ... arrest that he had taken decedent's car from the vicinity of Washtenaw and Hill Streets in the City of Ann Arbor. On direct examination, the defendant testified that he took the car from the parking ... ...
-
State v. Doleszny, 2004 VT 9 (Vt. 1/30/2004)
... ... Iowa Methodist Med. Ctr., 293 N.W.2d 550, 556 (Iowa 1980); Transit Auth. of River City v. Montgomery, 836 S.W.2d 413, 416 (Ky. 1992); Commonwealth v. Britto, 744 N.E.2d 1089, 1105 (Mass ... ...