Gay v. Hudson River Electric Power Co.
Decision Date | 09 January 1911 |
Docket Number | 116. |
Citation | 184 F. 689 |
Parties | GAY et al. v. HUDSON RIVER ELECTRIC POWER CO. et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
3. To pay over the surplus, if any, to whomsoever may be lawfully entitled to receive the same.
In consequence of these proceedings, all the property of the Empire State Company is now in the custody of the Circuit Court through its receivers. There are mortgages on the several properties of the allied companies, and in the course of the receivership proceedings the court on July 7, 1909 made an order allowing these various trustees, including the petitioner, to intervene in the suit-- a creditor's bill-- under which receivers were appointed, and to file cross-bills or ancillary bills for the foreclosure of these mortgages. Most, if not all, of the several trustees have begun suits in foreclosure; but this petitioner has not done so.
This cause comes here upon an appeal from an order of the Circuit Court, Northern District of New York, denying the application of the New York Trust Company, trustee under a mortgage of the Empire State Power Company, for leave to sell the mortgaged property; there having been default in payment of interest and of sinking fund moneys due under the mortgage.
The Empire State Power Company owns a dam, power house, river rights, and four or five dam sites on the Schoharie river and is engaged in the generating of electricity for light heat, and power and the sale thereof in the city of Amsterdam, N.Y., and immediate vicinity. All of its property is subject to the mortgage which was executed May 1, 1900, to secure an issue of bonds of which $210,000 are outstanding. It is a first mortgage on said property. Two of its clauses read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. v. Smith
...U.S. 194, 197, 198, 57 S.Ct. 418, 81 L.Ed. 599, 108 A.L.R. 738; Trustees v. Greenough, 105 U.S. 527, 26 L.Ed. 1157; Gay v. Hudson River Electric Power Co., 2 Cir., 184 F. 689; Dant & Russell v. J. D. Halstead Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 103 F.2d 306. The words `final decisions,' like the equivalent......
-
Seigle v. First Nat. Co.
... ... certificates, and no power is conferred on the trustee to ... pledge or mortgage such securities, ... Am ... Loan Co., 136 U.S. 89; Gay v. Hudson Elec. Co., ... 184 F. 689; Odell v. Batterman, 223 F. 292; ... ...
-
Escher v. Harrison Securities Co.
...creditor stipulated, which is incorporated in the contract and on the strength of which he lent his money." Gay v. Hudson River Elec. Power Co. (C. C. A.) 184 F. 689, 693, 694. Hardship on the mortgagor does not seem a ground for transferring the burden to the mortgagee, of whom it may well......
-
Moore v. Splitdorf Elec. Co.
...disturb contract rights—rights of property.' Kneeland v. American Loan Co., 136 U. S. 89, 10 S. Ct. 950, 34 L. Ed. 379; Gay v. Hudson Elec. Co. (C. C. A.) 184 F. 689; Odell v. Batterman (C. C. A.) 223 F. "* * * We are unable to find authority for the claim of the appellees that the court ha......