Gee v. Tenneco, Inc., No. 78-3168
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before WALLACE and ANDERSON; J. BLAINE ANDERSON |
| Citation | 615 F.2d 857 |
| Parties | Alice C. GEE, as Executrix of the Will of Tom B. Gee, and Alice C. Gee, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TENNECO, INC., as Successor to Heyden Newport Chemical Corporation and Does I through X, inclusive, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Docket Number | No. 78-3168 |
| Decision Date | 26 March 1980 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
152 practice notes
-
United States Fid. v. Lee Investments Llc, Nos. 08–17753
...because of the federal forum.’ ” Ticknor v. Choice Hotels Int'l., Inc., 265 F.3d 931, 939 (9th Cir.2001) (quoting Gee v. Tenneco, Inc., 615 F.2d 857, 861 (9th Cir.1980)). Perhaps a better way of putting it is to say that one of the goals in deciding state law questions is to do no harm to s......
-
United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc., No. 2:08–cv–02556–MCE–JFM.
...by construing the parties' written agreements. Schwartz v. Pillsbury Inc., 969 F.2d 840, 845–46 (9th Cir.1992); Gee v. Tenneco, Inc., 615 F.2d 857, 862 (9th Cir.1980); United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc., 987 F.Supp. 1233 (E.D.Cal.1997); Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Mfg.......
-
Creighton v. City of Livingston, No. 1:08-CV-01507-OWW-SMS.
...in order to make sure that the vindication of the state right is without discrimination because of the federal forum." Gee v. Tenneco, 615 F.2d 857, 861 (9th Cir.1980). In doing so, federal courts are bound by the pronouncement of the state's highest court on applicable state law. Davis v. ......
-
IN RE NAT. MORTG. EQUITY CORP. MORTG. POOL CERT. SECURITIES LITIGATION, No. MDL 647 AWT.
...of liability. See Ghouth v. Conticommodity Serv., Inc., 642 F.Supp. 1325, 1328-29 (N.D.Ill.1986). See generally Gee v. Tenneco, Inc., 615 F.2d 857, 863 (9th Cir.1980) (citing Ray v. Alad Corp., 19 Cal.3d 22, 136 Cal.Rptr. 574, 560 P.2d 3 (1977)). Indeed, plaintiffs appear merely to allege a......
Request a trial to view additional results
152 cases
-
United States Fid. v. Lee Investments Llc, Nos. 08–17753
...because of the federal forum.’ ” Ticknor v. Choice Hotels Int'l., Inc., 265 F.3d 931, 939 (9th Cir.2001) (quoting Gee v. Tenneco, Inc., 615 F.2d 857, 861 (9th Cir.1980)). Perhaps a better way of putting it is to say that one of the goals in deciding state law questions is to do no harm to s......
-
United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc., No. 2:08–cv–02556–MCE–JFM.
...by construing the parties' written agreements. Schwartz v. Pillsbury Inc., 969 F.2d 840, 845–46 (9th Cir.1992); Gee v. Tenneco, Inc., 615 F.2d 857, 862 (9th Cir.1980); United States v. Iron Mountain Mines, Inc., 987 F.Supp. 1233 (E.D.Cal.1997); Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Mfg.......
-
Creighton v. City of Livingston, No. 1:08-CV-01507-OWW-SMS.
...in order to make sure that the vindication of the state right is without discrimination because of the federal forum." Gee v. Tenneco, 615 F.2d 857, 861 (9th Cir.1980). In doing so, federal courts are bound by the pronouncement of the state's highest court on applicable state law. Davis v. ......
-
IN RE NAT. MORTG. EQUITY CORP. MORTG. POOL CERT. SECURITIES LITIGATION, No. MDL 647 AWT.
...of liability. See Ghouth v. Conticommodity Serv., Inc., 642 F.Supp. 1325, 1328-29 (N.D.Ill.1986). See generally Gee v. Tenneco, Inc., 615 F.2d 857, 863 (9th Cir.1980) (citing Ray v. Alad Corp., 19 Cal.3d 22, 136 Cal.Rptr. 574, 560 P.2d 3 (1977)). Indeed, plaintiffs appear merely to allege a......
Request a trial to view additional results