Gem Jewelry Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 12010.
| Decision Date | 26 February 1948 |
| Docket Number | No. 12010.,12010. |
| Citation | 165 F.2d 991 |
| Parties | GEM JEWELRY CO., Inc. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Harry Dow and Joel W. Cook, both of Houston, Tex., for petitioner.
Austin Hoyt, Sewall Key, George A. Stinson, Helen R. Carloss, and Harry Marselli, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Theron L. Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., and J. P. Wenchel, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Rollin H. Transue, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before SIBLEY, HOLMES, and WALLER, Circuit Judges.
This appeal involves income and excess profits taxes for the fiscal year that ended July 31, 1941. Two questions are presented: (1) Whether the Tax Court erred in sustaining the Commissioner's determination as to the deductions allowable as compensation for services of certain officers of the petitioner1; and (2) whether said court erred in sustaining the Commissioner's determination that the petitioner was not entitled to include in its equity invested capital the sum of $30,000, allegedly contributed as paid-in surplus. The evidence before the Tax Court consisted of the stipulation of facts agreed to by the parties, documents presented, and oral testimony.
The Tax Court disallowed portions of the salaries paid to the president and vice-president. The court correctly held that reasonableness of such compensation is a question of fact, and that, since the Commissioner's determination was presumptively correct, it had to be overcome by credible evidence. The court was not required to accept blindly the testimony of the diamond merchant who, as an expert witness, testified that in his opinion the salaries contended for were reasonable. The determination of whether the evidence is sufficient to rebut the presumption in favor of the Commissioner's finding is for the Tax Court as trier of the facts.2 The salaries paid were not fixed by an arm's-length transaction, for the two Jacobs brothers controlled the corporation,3 and we agree with the Tax Court that the evidence was insufficient.
With respect to the second question, as to whether the Tax Court correctly sustained the Commissioner's determination that the petitioner was not entitled to include for the taxable year in its equity invested capital the sum of $30,000 allegedly contributed to paid-in surplus, we conclude that the Tax Court was correct in its holding that...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
JH Robinson Truck Lines v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.
...751. This Court has held that the question of whether rents and salaries are reasonable or excessive is one of fact. Gem Jewelry Co. v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 165 F.2d 991, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 846, 68 S.Ct. 1516, 92 L.Ed. 1770. The same rule obtains in other circuits. Ecco High Freque......
-
Cooke v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 4496.
...upon it with his key employees, does not bind the Tax Court. Helvering v. National Grocery Co., supra; Gem Jewelry Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 5 Cir., 165 F.2d 991, certiorari denied 334 U.S. 846, 68 S.Ct. 1516, 92 L.Ed. 1770. The employees were paid compensation comparable to ......
-
RP Farnsworth & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.
...taxpayer's evidence must be sufficient to rebut it. Welch v. Helvering, 290 U.S. 111, 115, 54 S.Ct. 8, 78 L.Ed. 212; Gem Jewelry Co. v. C. I. R., 5 Cir., 165 F.2d 991. When the case reaches this Court, the Tax Court's finding of the amount constituting reasonable compensation is entitled to......
-
Potter Electric Signal and Manufacturing Co. v. CIR
...a fact question to be resolved by the Tax Court. Hoffman Radio Corp. v. C. I. R., 9 Cir., 1949, 177 F.2d 264; Gem Jewelry Co. v. C.I.R., 5 Cir., 1948, 165 F.2d 991, certiorari denied, 334 U.S. 846, 68 S.Ct. 1516, 92 L.Ed. 1770; Ecco High Frequency Corp. v. C. I.R., 2 Cir., 1948, 167 F.2d 58......