General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System, In re
| Decision Date | 24 February 1988 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 85-203,s. 85-203 |
| Citation | 753 P.2d 76 |
| Parties | In re The GENERAL ADJUDICATION OF ALL RIGHTS TO USE WATER IN THE BIG HORN RIVER SYSTEM and all other sources, State of Wyoming. The STATE of Wyoming, Appellant, v. OWL CREEK IRRIGATION DISTRICT MEMBERS; Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes; Landis Webber and Barbara Webber, individually and on behalf of Red Creek Cattle Company, Bertha Jones and Grace Graboski; United States; City of Riverton, Midvale Irrigation District, and Riverton Valley Irrigation District, Appellees. OWL CREEK IRRIGATION DISTRICT MEMBERS, Appellants, v. The STATE of Wyoming, Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes; Landis Webber and Barbara Webber, individually and on behalf of Red Creek Cattle Company, Bertha Jones and Grace Graboski; City of Riverton, Midvale Irrigation District, and Riverton Valley Irrigation District, Appellees. SHOSHONE AND ARAPAHOE TRIBES, Appellants, v. The STATE of Wyoming, Owl Creek Irrigation District Members, Landis Webber and Barbara Webber, individually and on behalf of Red Creek Cattle Company, Bertha Jones and Grace Graboski; United States; City of Riverton, Midvale Irrigation District, and Riverton Valley Irrigation District, Appellees. Landis WEBBER and Barbara Webber, individually and on behalf of Red Creek Cattle Company, Bertha Jones and Grace Graboski, Appellants, v. The STATE of Wyoming; Owl Creek Irrigation District Members; Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes; United States; City of Riverton, Midvale Irrigation District, and Riverton Valley Irrigation District, Appellees. CITY OF RIVERTON, Midvale Irrigation District, and Riverton Valley Irrigation District, Appellants, v. The STATE of Wyoming; Owl Creek Irrigation District Members; Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes; Landis Webber and Barbara Webber, individually and on behalf of Red Creek Cattle Company, Bertha Jones and Grace Graboski; United States, Appellees. UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. The STATE of Wyoming, Owl Creek Irrigation District Members; Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes; Landis Webber and Barbara Webber, individually and on |
| Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Joseph B. Meyer, Atty. Gen., S. Jane Caton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Steven F. Freudenthal, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., with Freudenthal, Freudenthal, Salzburg, Bonds & Rideout, Cheyenne, Houston G. Williams, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., with Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, Casper, Michael D. White and David F. Jankowski, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., with White and Jankowski, Denver, Colo., and Randall T. Cox, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., with Omohundro and Palmerlee, Buffalo, for State of Wyo. Argument presented by Michael D. White, for Type 1 and 2 Claims, and Randall T. Cox for Type 1, 2 and 3 Claims, also present at counsel table were A.G. McClintock, Wyoming Atty. Gen., and S. Jane Caton, Asst. Atty. General.
Ruth Clare Yonkee, Thermopolis, for Red Lane Watershed Imp. Dist., Town of East Thermopolis.
C. Edward Webster, II, Cody, for Owl Creek Irr. Dist.
Donald P. White of White & White, Riverton, for City of Riverton, Midvale Irr. Dist. and Riverton Irr. Dist.
Kenneth Guido, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Shoshone Tribe.
W. Richard West, Jr. and Susan M. Williams of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, Washington, D.C., and B. Kevin Gover and Susan M. Williams of Gover, Williams & Stetson, Albuquerque, N.M., and Thomas W. Fredericks, Dale T. White, and Robert S. Pelcyger of Fredericks & Pelcyger, Boulder, Colo., and William J. Thomson and W. Perry Dray of Dray, Madison & Thomson, Cheyenne, for Shoshone and Northern Arapahoe Tribes.
Michael S. Messenger of Messenger & Jurovich, Thermopolis, for Landis Webber and Barbara Webber, individually and on behalf of Red Creek Cattle Co.
Bertha Jones and Grace Graboski.
F. Henry Habicht II, Asst. Atty. Gen. and James J. Clear, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for U.S.
Sky D Phifer of Phifer & Phifer, Lander, for Albert Hornecker and Hornecker Livestock Co., Inc.
Donald Bath and DHB & Co., and PLB & Co., Bradford Bath, Griffin Brothers, Inc., Ralph Floyd Urbigkit, Charles Richardson and Richard and Elsie Martin.
Ross D. Copenhaver of Copenhaver, Kahl & Kath, Powell, for Willwood Irr. Dist. and Deaver Irr. Dist.
Oral argument presented by Robert S. Pelcyger for Arapahoe Tribes, Type 1, 2, and 3 Claims; C. Edward Webster II for Owl Creek Irr. Dist., Type 2 Claims; Donald P. White for private parties City of Riverton, et al., Type 1 Claims; James J. Clear for U.S., Type 1 and 2 Claims; Michael S. Messenger for private parties Type 3 Claims; Sky D Phifer for Hornecker, et al., Type 3 Claims; also present at counsel table were Ruth Clare Yonkee; Dale T. White; Thomas W. Fredericks; David F. Jankowski; and B. Kevin Gover, Arthur Lazarus, Jr., and W. Richard West, Jr., for the Shoshone Tribes.
Before BROWN, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, and MACY, JJ., and HANSCUM, District Judge.
This appeal is from the district court's order adjudicating rights to use water in the Big Horn River System and all other sources within the State's Water Division No. 3. The district court modified the special master's recommended decree. All parties have appealed from the district court's amended judgment and decree. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
We begin by acknowledging the comprehensive reports of both the special master and the district court and our use of these reports in our preparation of this section of this opinion.
Water Division No. 3 is essentially identical with what is known as the Big Horn River drainage basin. (See map appended.) It is located in Fremont, Hot Springs, Washakie, Big Horn and Park counties in northwestern and west central Wyoming and includes parts of Yellowstone National Park. Other federal entities included are the Wind River Indian Reservation, located in the southeastern portion of the region, consisting of approximately 4,000 square miles of land area, the Shoshone and Big Horn National Forests, the East Fork Winter Elk Pasture, the Sheridan County Elk Winter Pasture, the Yellowtail Wildlife Habitat Management Area, the Middle Creek Drainage Area of Yellowstone National Park, the Big Horn Canyon National Recreation Area, and numerous public water reserves, water wells and stock driveways upon federal lands administered by the Bureau of Land Management.
The topography of the area is varied. It includes mountain peaks and valleys, high plateaus, terraced stream valleys and low desert badlands. Elevations range from 3,870 feet near the town of Basin to over 13,000 feet in the Wind River Range. On the reservation the elevation varies from 4,500 feet at the northeastern corner near the Wind River Canyon to 12,500 feet in the Wind River Range.
The primary drainage system in the division is the Wind River-Big Horn River which originates in northern Fremont County and leaves the Division at the Wyoming-Montana border in northern Big Horn County. By statutory definition the division also includes the Clark's Fork of the Yellowstone River, § 41-3-501(a)(iii), W.S.1977, originating in northwestern Park County, which drains much of the northwestern portion of the region. The Shoshone River, a major tributary of the Big Horn River which originates in northern Park County and joins the Big Horn at the Yellowtail Reservoir, is the other major drainage system in Division 3.
The history of the Big Horn Basin for purposes of this...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State ex rel. Martinez v. Lewis
... ... , Santa Fe, for defendant-appellee, Water Defense Ass'n ... Herbert A ... This case is a continuation of the general adjudication of the Rio Hondo River system. It specifically involves the water rights of the Mescalero Apache Indian Reservation. See ... of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River System, 753 P.2d 76 (Wyo.1988), cert ... ...
-
Confederated Salish and Kootenai v. Clinch
... ... to change the use of state appropriative water rights on the Flathead Reservation prior to ... change applications prior to a final adjudication of the Tribes' reserved rights ... of rights to the use of water of a river system or other source, or (2) for the ... suit shall be served upon the Attorney General or his designated representative ... of All Rights to Use Water in Big Horn River Sys., 835 P.2d 273, 279 (Wyo.1992) ("Water ... ...
-
State v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency
... ... Michael, Wyoming Attorney General, Jay Jerde and James Kaste with him on the ... , with him on the briefs), Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, Colorado, for Intervenor Eastern ... diminished the boundaries of the Wind River Reservation in Wyoming in 1905. We find that it ... most of America, assumed the reservation system would eventually cease to exist and members of ... and character" in a tract around the Big Horn Hot Springs, located on the northern boundary of ... and character, in and to the lands, and the water rights appertaining thereunto" for the sum of ... Court's decision in In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn River ... ...
-
Yellowbear v. Wyoming Attorney General
... ... Echohawk, Native American Rights Fund, Boulder, CO, Kimberly ... Page 1257 ... Arapaho Tribe, which resides on the Wind River Indian Reservation ("Reservation") along with the ... State court: proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim— ... (1) resulted in a decision ... surveying, and $25,000 for an irrigation system "on the diminished reservation." Id. The Court ... the majority and dissenting opinions in Big Horn I. According to the Yellowbear court, both the ... Page 1266 ... maintenance, water and sewer service, planning and zoning, and law ... ...
-
Conflict comes to roost! The Bureau of Reclamation and the federal Indian trust responsibility.
...(67) Winters, 207 U.S. at 577; Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. at 600; In re Rights to Use Water in Big Horn River (In re Big Horn River, 753 P.2d 76, 94 (Wyo. 1988), affd by an equally divided court sub. norm., Wyoming v. United States, 492 U.S. 406 (68) E.g., United States v. Adair, 478 F......
-
State Water Ownership and the Future of Groundwater Management.
...2019), reh'g denied (Nov. 4, 2019). But see In re Gen. Adjudication of All Rts. To Use Water in the Big Horn River Sys. (Big Horn I), 753 P.2d 76, 99-100 (Wyo. 1988) (rejecting the application of Winters rights to groundwater), aff'd by an equally divided court sub nom. Wyoming v. United St......
-
The 1997 water rights settlement between the state of Montana and the Chippewa Cree tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation: the role of community and of the trustee.
...to preserve and replace fishing grounds). (18.) In re the General Adjudication of all Rights to Use of Water in the Big Horn River System, 753 P.2d 76, 94-97 (Wyo. 1988) (rejecting the finding of the Special Master that treaty language stating "[t]he Indians herein named agree ... they will......
-
Seven myths of Northwest water law and associated stories.
...to instream purposes without complying with state law); In re General Adjudication of All Rights to Use Water in the Big Horn Sys., 753 P.2d 76, 98-100 (Wyo. 1988) (no reserved water rights for fish on Wind River Indian Reservation absent a treaty provision; no reserved groundwater rights).......