General Business Services, Inc. v. Fletcher, 14340.

Decision Date21 December 1970
Docket NumberNo. 14340.,14340.
PartiesGENERAL BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., Appellee, v. Silas FLETCHER, Sr., d/b/a General Business Services, Route 1, Box 90, Gatesville, North Carolina, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit

Thomas A. McKee, Richmond, Va., for appellant.

John H. Hall, Jr., Elizabeth City, N. C. (Jeffrey L. Gardy, Suffolk, Va., and Gerald F. White, Elizabeth City, N. C., on the brief), for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, WINTER, Circuit Judge, and THOMSEN, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In a suit for damages and an injunction in which it was alleged that defendant, after termination of a franchise agreement, continued to use plaintiff's trademark to identify tax and record keeping services performed by defendant and used plaintiff's record books bearing plaintiff's registered trademark, the district court, 308 F.Supp. 1135 granted plaintiff an injunction, awarded money damages in the amount specified in the contract and awarded an attorney's fee.

On appeal defendant claims as the principal grounds for reversal that the case was improperly tried non-jury and that plaintiff lost certain of defendant's exhibits which were submitted to plaintiff's attorneys for inspection.

The complaint, defendant's answer and amended answer all demanded a jury trial. But the subsequent final pretrial order recited that at the pretrial conference, which plaintiff attended by counsel and defendant in proper person, "all parties waived trial by jury" and ordered that the case be tried without a jury. By letter, written five days later, defendant, who throughout the trial appeared in proper person, wrote that he understood the court would decide the points of law but that a jury would assess damages.* He purportedly renewed his demand for a jury trial. Nonetheless, the case was tried non-jury.

We see no error. The pretrial order recites a valid waiver of jury trial and once waived the subsequent demand was not timely. Rule 38, F.R.Civ.P. Subsequent to argument, we sought to obtain a transcript of the pretrial conference to determine if there was any basis to impeach or question the accuracy of the pretrial order. We are advised that a reporter was present but was not requested to take any notes. There is no basis, therefore, to go behind the pre-trial order, or to corroborate any claim of misunderstanding on the part of the pro se defendant.

Plaintiff's counsel admits to the loss...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Sewell v. Jefferson County Fiscal Court
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • February 6, 1989
    ...Cir.1980) (amended complaint which provided for trial "without a jury" sufficient to waive jury trial); General Business Servs., Inc. v. Fletcher, 435 F.2d 863, 864 (4th Cir.1970) (order of court noting waiver of jury trial); accord Lovelace, 820 F.2d at 227 (pretrial minutes stating that j......
  • Reyes v. People
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Colorado
    • November 3, 2008
    ...(1st Cir.1980) for proposition that party withdrawing right to jury trial may not simply change his mind); Gen. Bus. Servs., Inc. v. Fletcher, 435 F.2d 863, 864 (4th Cir.1970); State v. Gallegos, 147 P.3d 473, 476-77 (Utah Ct.App.2006) (holding that mid-trial appointment of counsel after va......
  • Deere & Co. v. Fimco Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Kentucky
    • August 18, 2016
    ...sufficient to relieve the party from the effects of an otherwise valid waiver of a jury trial." (citing Gen. Bus. Servs., Inc. v. Fletcher, 435 F.2d 863, 864 (4th Cir. 1970) (per curiam); Bush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 425 F.2d 393, 396 (5th Cir. ...
  • ASPENWOOD, LLC v. CAT, LLC
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Utah
    • February 6, 2003
    ...for over a month after judge's oral ruling regarding bench trial sufficient to affirm waiver of jury trial); General Bus. Servs., Inc. v. Fletcher, 435 F.2d 863, 864 (4th Cir.1970) (concluding that appellant waived right to jury when appellant failed to object to court's pretrial order that......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT