General Electric Company v. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America

Decision Date03 June 1957
Docket NumberNo. 276,276
Citation353 U.S. 547,77 S.Ct. 921,1 L.Ed.2d 1028
PartiesGENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Petitioner, v. LOCAL 205, UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO AND MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA (U.E.)
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Mr.

Warren F. Farr, Boston, Mass., for the petitioner.

Mr. Allan R. Rosenberg, Boston, Mass., for the respondent.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a companion case to No. 211, Textile Workers Union of America v. Lincoln Mills of Alabama, 353 U.S. 448, 77 S.Ct. 912. Respondent-union and petitioner-employer entered into a collective bargaining agreement governing the hours of work, rates of pay, and working conditions in a Massachusetts plant owned by petitioner. The agreement provided a procedure for the settlement of employee grievances, a procedure having four steps. It also provided that, when the four steps had been exhausted, either party could, with exceptions not material here, submit the grievance to arbitration.

The respondent filed written grievances, one asking higher pay for an employee and another complaining that an employee had been wrongfully discharged. Both complaints were carried through the four steps. The union, being dissatisfied, asked for arbitration. The employer refused. The union brought suit in the District Court to compel arbitration of the grievance disputes. The District Court dismissed the bill, being of the view that the relief sought was barred by the Norris-LaGuardia Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 101 et seq. 129 F.Supp. 665. The Court of Appeals reversed, 233 F.2d 85. It first held that the Norris-LaGuardia Act did not bar enforcement of the arbitration agreement. It then held that while § 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185(a) gave the District Court jurisdiction of the cause, it supplied no body of substantive law to enforce an arbitration agreement governing grievances. But it found such a basis in the United States Arbitration Act, which it held applicable to these collective bargaining agreements. It accordingly reversed the District Court judgment and remanded the cause to that court for further proceedings.

We affirm that judgment and remand the cause to the District Court. We follow in part a different path than the Court of Appeals, though we reach the same result. As indicated in our opinion in No. 211, Textile Workers Union of America v. Lincoln Mills of Alabama, supra, we think that § 301(a) furnishes a body of federal substantive law...

To continue reading

Request your trial
110 cases
  • International Union of Elec., Radio and Mach. Workers, AFL-CIO v. General Elec. Co.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 26 Septiembre 1961
    ...International Hod Carriers, 2 Cir., 182 F.2d 806, 809, 17 A.L.R.2d 609 & note, 614, 625 § 8, 627 § 10; General Electric Co. v. Local 205, 353 U.S. 547, 548, 77 S.Ct. 921, 1 L.Ed.2d 1028; McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of Carpenters, supra; Volunteer Electric Cooperative v.......
  • Gilmer v. Interstate Johnson Lane Corporation
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 13 Mayo 1991
    ...Goodall-Sanford, Inc. v. Textile Workers, 353 U.S. 550, 77 S.Ct. 920, 1 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1957), and General Electric Co. v. Electrical Workers, 353 U.S. 547, 77 S.Ct. 921, 1 L.Ed.2d 1028 (1957). Although the Court decided the enforceability of the arbitration provisions in the collective-barga......
  • American Airlines, Inc. v. Louisville & Jefferson CAB
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • 18 Septiembre 1959
    ...Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America v. General Electric Co., 1 Cir., 1956, 233 F.2d 85, 97, affirmed 1957, 353 U.S. 547, 77 S.Ct. 921, 1 L.Ed.2d 1028. So far as relevant here, § 2 provides "A written provision in any * * contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to s......
  • Lundgren v. Freeman
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 27 Junio 1962
    ...205, United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers of America v. General Electric Co., 1 Cir., 1956, 233 F.2d 85, affd. 353 U.S. 547, 77 S.Ct. 921, 1 L.Ed. 2d 1028). The policy of the Arbitration Act is that the agreement be liberally construed in favor of arbitration. (E. g., Metro Industria......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT