General Fireproofing Co. v. L. Wallace & Son

Citation175 F. 650
Decision Date05 January 1910
Docket Number3,006-3,008.
PartiesGENERAL FIREPROOFING CO. v. L. WALLACE & SON. TITLE GUARANTY & SURETY CO. OF SCRANTON, PA., v. SAME. L. WALLACE & SON v. GENERAL FIREPROOFING CO. et al.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)

A. H Sargent and Frank Hagerman (F. H. Atwood, on the briefs), for General Fireproofing Co. and Title Guaranty & Surety Co.

John N Hughes and Frank F. Dawley, for L. Wallace & Son.

Before SANBORN and VAN DEVANTER, Circuit Judges, and POLLOCK District judge.

POLLOCK District Judge.

The above numbered and entitled cases arose out of one transaction, were argued and submitted on the same record and will be considered together as one case. The facts necessary to a decision may be briefly summarized, as follows:

In the year 1904 the Cedar Rapids Hotel Company, desiring to erect in the city of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, a six-story hotel, now built and occupied by it and known as the 'Montrose Hotel,' entered into a contract with L. Wallace & Son, a firm of contractors and builders (hereinafter called 'original contractor'), to furnish all materials and perform all labor required in building, erecting and finishing said hotel building complete, above the basement story, ready for occupancy and use by the hotel company as a hotel.

This contract is the general form used by the American Institute of Architects and the National Association of Builders, and has attached thereto particular specifications and requirements for the doing of the work, furnishing the materials, for supervision of the work by the architects, the making of estimates and payments thereon, etc. On September 21, 1904, thereafter, the original contractor entered into a subcontract with the General Fireproofing Company (hereinafter called the 'Fireproofing Company') to furnish all materials and perform all labor in connection with the work of fireproofing the hotel according to the expanded metal system of construction, the laying of walks, floors, roof, etc. In this contract the original contractor was designated for convenience as owner and the Fireproofing Company as contractor. This contract contains, among others, the following provisions:

'Article I. The contractor shall and will provide all the materials and perform all the work for the fireproofing of the Third Avenue Hotel, located at Cedar Rapids, Iowa, according to the expanded metal system of construction and consisting of the following:
'The erection of the concrete and expanded metal floors ready to receive wooden floor strips or the foundation for mosaic or other floors, and ready to plaster underneath, the roof ready for tar and gravel, the partitions of metal studding and lathing and a suspended ceiling under the roofs ready to plaster, a rough concrete sidewalk ready to receive the 3' top, and the concrete stairs with smooth trowel finish.
'Contractor agrees to furnish and erect all necessary steel, including columns, beams, girders, wall lintels, plates, anchors and stair carriages, and guarantees the structural steel to carry loads shown and specified, and to furnish a bond to cover this part of the work as required by the specifications.
'Work to be executed as shown on drawings and described in specifications prepared by the Josselyn & Taylor Co., architects, in connection with the drawings submitted by the contractor, and which are a part of this contract.
'Art. II. It is understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the work included in this contract is to be done under the direction of the said architects and that their decision as to the true construction and meaning of the drawings and specifications shall be final. * * *
'Art. IV. The contractor shall provide sufficient, safe and proper facilities at all times for the inspection of the work by the architects or their authorized representatives; shall, within twenty-four hours after receiving written notice from the architects to that effect, proceed to remove from the grounds or buildings all materials condemned by them, whether worked or unworked, and to take down all portions of the work which the architects shall by like written notice condemn as unsound or improper, or as in any way failing to conform to the drawings and specifications, and shall make good all work damaged or destroyed thereby. * * *
'Art. X. It is further mutually agreed between the parties hereto that no certificate given or payment made under this contract except the final certificate or final payment, shall be conclusive evidence of the performance of this contract either wholly or in part and that no payment shall be construed to be an acceptance of defective work or improper materials.'

In compliance with the specifications for the doing of the work which were prepared by the architects Josselyn & Taylor Company, and which became a part of this contract by adoption under the provisions of article I, the Fireproofing Company procured the Title Guaranty & Trust Company of Scranton, Pa. (hereinafter called the 'Guaranty Company'), to execute and deliver its bond to the original contractor for the faithful performance of its obligations, in terms, as follows, to wit:

'Know all men by these presents: That the General Fireproofing Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Ohio (hereinafter called the principal) and the Title Guaranty & Trust Company of Scranton, Pa., a corporation created and existing under the laws of the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and whose principal office is located in the city of Scranton, commonwealth of Pennsylvania (hereinafter called the surety), are held and firmly bound unto L. Wallace & Son, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa (hereinafter called the obligees), in the full and just sum of twenty-five thousand six hundred sixty dollars ($25,660.00) lawful money of the United States, to the payment of which sum, well and truly to be made the said principal binds itself, its successors and assigns jointly and severally firmly by these presents, signed, sealed and delivered this 30th day of September, A.D. 1904.
'Whereas, said principal has entered into a certain written contract with the obligees, dated September 21, 1904, wherein and whereby the said principal agrees to provide all the materials and perform all the work for the fireproofing of the Third Avenue Hotel, located at Cedar Rapids, Iowa, according to the expanded metal system of construction and consisting of the following:
'The erection of the concrete and expanded metal floors ready to receive wooden floor strips on the foundation for mosaic or other floors, and ready to plaster underneath, the floors ready for tar and gravel, the partitions of metal studding and lathing, and a suspended ceiling under the roofs ready to plaster, and rough concrete sidewalk ready to receive the 3' top, and the concrete stairs with smooth trowel finish.
'Contractor agrees to furnish and erect all necessary steel, including columns, beams, girders, wall lintels, plates, anchors, and stair carriages.
'Now, therefore, the condition of the foregoing obligation is such that if the said principal shall well and truly indemnify and save harmless the said obligees from any and all pecuniary loss resulting from the breach of any of the terms, covenants and conditions of said contract on the part of said principal to be performed, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise, to remain in full force and effect both in law and in equity.
'The said principal and the said surety hereby especially guarantee that the structural steel to be erected under said contract to carry loads as shown and specified.
'The surety to this bond is expressly exempt from liability for any damage resulting from any act of God, or public enemies, or mobs, or riots, or civil commotion, or by employes leaving the work being done under said contract on account of so-called 'strikes' or labor difficulties.
'In testimony whereof the said principal and the said surety have caused these presents to be executed by their proper officers the said day and year first above written.'

Under the provisions of these contracts the construction of the building was begun and proceeded with by the contracting parties in convenient relation, the original contractor carrying up the the brick walls, and the Fireproofing Company following with the laying of the concrete floors and other fireproofing work until the month of March, 1905, at a time when the fourth floor of the building had been laid and work was progressing on the fifth story when cracks were discovered in the outer walls of the building. These cracks first appeared on the Third street side of the building; later, on the Third avenue side. In some instances they were in perpendicular lines breaking through the bricks; in other cases in diagonal lines running through the joints between the bricks and between the brick and stone work of the building.

At first these breaks or lines of cleavage were noticeable on the outer side of the wall only, but gradually enlarged until they extended through the walls to the interior side. The concrete used by the Fireproofing Company in the building was what is known as cinder concrete. During the construction of the building, cold weather having intervened, two of the floors froze in setting, and the Fireproofing Company was compelled to and did take them out and relay the floors. There also arose a controversy between the original contractor and the Fireproofing Company as to whose duty it was, under the terms of the contract, to furnish the false jambs used in the construction of the interior metal fireproofing partitions. These jambs were ultimately furnished by the original contractor at a cost of $800. The roof...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • McCullough v. Clinch-Mitchell Const. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 22, 1934
    ...Frisco Lumber Co. v. Hodge (C. C. A.) 218 F. 778, 780; United States v. Hurley (C. C. A.) 182 F. 776, 777; General Fireproofing Co. v. L. Wallace & Son (C. C. A.) 175 F. 650, 662; Cook v. Foley (C. C. A.) 152 F. 41, 51; Roberts, Johnson & Rand S. Co. v. Westinghouse El. & Mfg. Co. (C. C. A.......
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Board of Commissioners Sewer Improvement District No. 1 of Blytheville
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • February 17, 1919
    ...not aware of the defective work. 100 Ark. 166; 207 S.W. 33; 185 Id. 474; 51 U.S. (L. Ed.), 811; 10 Am. Rep. 449; 84 N.W. 724; 45 N.E. 1013; 175 F. 650; 72 Ark. 525; 97 Id. Where an engineer fails to exercise honest judgment or makes such gross mistakes as to imply bad faith, his decision is......
  • Kennedy v. Bowling
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 17, 1928
    ... ... Co., 153 Mo. 487; Hartford Mill Co. v. Tobacco ... Warehouse Co., 121 S.W. 477; General Fireproofing ... Co. v. Wallace, 175 F. 650; Nave v. McGrane, ... 113 P. 82; State v ... ...
  • Hoye v. Century Builders, Inc.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1954
    ...have been applied to building contracts. Minemount Realty Co., Inc., v. Ballentine, 111 N.J.Eq. 398, 162 A. 594; General Fireproofing Co. v. L. Wallace & Son, 8 Cir., 175 F. 650; Kennedy v. Bowling, 319 Mo. 401, 4 S.W.2d 438. * * This court said in McConnell v. Gordon Const. Co., 105 Wash. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT