George H. Lee Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 419.
Decision Date | 28 August 1940 |
Docket Number | No. 419.,419. |
Citation | 113 F.2d 583 |
Parties | GEORGE H. LEE CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Donald J. Burke, of Omaha, Neb., for petitioner.
William T. Chantland, Sp. Atty., of Washington, D. C. (W. T. Kelley, Chief Counsel, Martin A. Morrison, Asst. Chief Counsel, and James W. Nichol, Sp. Atty., all of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.
Before GARDNER and SANBORN, Circuit Judges, and COLLET, District Judge.
The petitioner, a Nebraska corporation engaged in advertising, distributing and selling in interstate commerce a product called "Gizzard Capsules" as a remedy or vermifuge for worms in poultry, has petitioned for the review of an order of the Federal Trade Commission requiring that petitioner "cease and desist from representing: (1) that said product is a remedy or vermifuge for all three kinds of worms in poultry; (2) that said product will remove pinworms from poultry; (3) that said product will remove tapeworms from poultry unless it be represented with equal conspicuousness that this product merely shears off the strobilae or chain of segments of the tapeworm, leaving the head of the worm, capable of growing new segments, attached to the intestines of the fowl."
The petitioner challenges this order upon one ground, which is that the representations which the Commission found to be false and misleading, and which are prohibited by its order, had previously been adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction not to be false representations, in a libel proceeding brought by the government to condemn forty-seven packages of "Gizzard Capsules", which adjudication it is claimed was binding upon the Commission.
The libel proceeding was instituted on August 8, 1934, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The United States in that proceeding charged that this same product was * * *' " * * *'
The petitioner, as claimant and manufacturer of the product, defended the libel proceeding. It denied that the labels or circulars contained false statements as alleged by the government, and denied that its statements were either false or fraudulent or that the capsules were incapable of producing the effects that it was represented they would produce. There were, then, two issues of fact presented for determination in the libel proceeding: (1) Were the challenged statements contained in the labels and circulars false? (2) Was the petitioner guilty of fraud in making such statements? After a trial, the court resolved both of these issues in favor of the petitioner and entered a decree dismissing the proceeding. The government took no appeal, and the decree became final.
Thereafter, on June 11, 1936, the Federal Trade Commission issued its complaint charging petitioner with the use of unfair methods of competition in interstate commerce within the meaning of the "Federal Trade Commission Act", Sections 41-58, U.S.C.Title 15, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 41-58, to the injury of competitors, by soliciting the sale of and selling "Gizzard Capsules" upon "extravagant, deceptive, misleading and false statements regarding the therapeutic value, efficacy and effect" of its product in advertisements on labels and in pamphlets, newspapers and magazines. The Commission further charged that "as a result thereof, substantial injury has been, and is now being, done by respondent petitioner here to substantial competition in commerce among and between the various States of the United States and in the District of Columbia."
The petitioner moved to strike so much of the complaint as was based upon representations as to the efficacy of its product for the treatment of large roundworms, large tapeworms and pinworms in poultry, on the ground that in the libel proceeding the falsity of such representations was in issue, and that the court in its decree had determined that they were not false, and, in so doing, had necessarily determined the product to be efficacious for the purposes for which it was intended and sold. The motion to strike was denied, and the petitioner filed its answer denying the allegations of the complaint and asserting the defense of res judicata. The Commission overruled that defense, apparently upon the theory that the decree in the libel proceeding was not binding upon it; and, after extended hearings, it found that petitioner, in advertising its product, represented that it was a single remedy for the several kinds of worms in poultry and that this single remedy for all kinds of worms was better than separate remedies for each kind of worm; and also found ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
New Jersey Wood Finishing Co. v. Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co.
...68 S.Ct. 822, 92 L.Ed. 1196 (1948); United States v. Willard Tablet Co., 141 F.2d 141, 143 (7 Cir. 1944); George H. Lee Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 113 F.2d 583 (8 Cir. 1940); United States v. Piuma, 40 F. Supp. 119 (S.D.Calif.1941); affirmed 126 F.2d 601 (9 Cir. 1942); See 152 ALR Ann......
-
F. T. C. v. Texaco, Inc.
...reserve estimates was necessary and essential to the FPC's ratemaking task, the FTC does not argue this issue in this appeal.129 113 F.2d 583 (8th Cir. 1940).130 141 F.2d 141 (7th Cir. 1944).131 432 F.2d 137 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 942, 91 S.Ct. 241, 27 L.Ed.2d 246 (1970).132......
-
State ex rel. Lane v. Corneli
... ... 1 State of Missouri at the Relation of George W. Lane and Wm. S. Bedal, Executors Under the Will of Sarah ... 385, 35 S.W.2d 639; ... George H. Lee Co. v. Federal Trade Comm., 113 F.2d ... 583; 11 C. J., secs. 88, 385, ... 122; State ex rel ... State Highway Commission v. Moore, 322 Mo. 329, 18 ... S.W.2d 892. But such a ... ...
-
F. T. C. v. Texaco, Inc.
...310 U.S. at 402-03, 60 S.Ct. at 916. See also French v. Rishell, 40 Cal.2d 477, 254 P.2d 26 (1953) (en banc ).19 George H. Lee Co. v. FTC, 113 F.2d 583 (8th Cir. 1940).20 United States v. Willard Tablet Co., 141 F.2d 141 (7th Cir. 1944).21 Rule 81(a)(3), F.R.Civ.P., provides that Federal Ru......