George Zartman v. First National Bank of Waterloo, New York

Decision Date21 February 1910
Docket NumberNo. 74,74
Citation216 U.S. 134,54 L.Ed. 418,30 S.Ct. 368
PartiesGEORGE E. ZARTMAN, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Francis Bacon, Plff. in Err., v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WATERLOO, NEW YORK
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

This was a suit brought in the supreme court of the state of New York by the First National Bank of Waterloo, New York, against Francis Bacon and George E. Zartman, as Bacon's trustee in bankruptcy, to procure the reformation of a written contract made by plaintiff and defendant Bacon February 15, 1902.

Before the contract was made, Bacon was president of the First National Bank of Waterloo, New York, and also of the Waterloo Wagon Company. He was active in the office of the wagon company, while the business of the bank was looked after by its cashier, Becker. The Waterloo bank had extended credit to the wagon company and to Bacon individually, discounting paper and taking notes.

The Exchange National Bank of Seneca Falls, New York held, by assignment from Bacon, 461 shares of the stock of the wagon company, and 253 shares of the Waterloo bank, as continuing collateral security for any existing or future indebtedness of Bacon or the wagon company.

The contract between Bacon and the Waterloo bank provided that the shares were 'to be held by said bank as a continuing collateral security for the payment to it of any indebtedness or liability of any kind, absolute or contingent, due or not due, now existing or that may hereafter exist, arise, accrue, or be contracted, on the part of himself or of the Waterloo Wagon Company, Limited, to said bank, and the said Francis Bacon hereby agrees with the First National Bank of Waterloo that the said certificates of stock above named are transferred to and may be held by the said First National Bank of Waterloo as a continuing collateral security for the payment to it of any indebtedness or liability of any kind, absolute or contingent, now existing or that may hereafter exist, arise, accrue, or be contracted on the part of the Waterloo Wagon Company, Limited, or himself, to said bank, and said shares of stock, upon their surrender by the Exchange National Bank, shall be deposited with the said First National Bank of Waterloo.'

The words in italics were omitted from the contract by mutual mistakes made in preparing and executing it, and the New York supreme court, by its decision, reformed the contract by inserting them. In the meantime, however, Bacon had become a bankrupt, having been so adjudicated May 4, 1904, and defendant...

To continue reading

Request your trial
86 cases
  • Coates v. Smith
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • October 17, 1916
    ... ... See Bank v ... Coats, 205 F. 618, 123 C. C. A ... case first from such standpoint, it is the settled law in ... 145, ... 120 P. 373; Zartman v. First Nat. Bank, 216 U.S ... 134, 30 ... "Personally appeared before me, George Crockett, clerk ... of the probate court in ... The ... national bankrupt law provides that: ... Trustees in ... ...
  • Pierce v. National Bank of Commerce in St. Louis
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • November 6, 1920
    ... ... Louis, Mo. (Alton ... B. Parker, of New York City, and John F. Green, S.W. Fordyce, ... Jr., and John ... brief), for appellant ... George ... L. Edwards, of St. Louis, Mo. (Edward J. White, of St ... two questions: ... First ... Did the complaint state facts sufficient to ... 83, ... 364, 371; First Nat. Bank of Waterloo v. Bacon, 113 ... A.D. 612, 98 N.Y.Supp. 717, 719; First ... Bank (Sup.) 153 N.Y.Supp. 818, 820; ... Zartman v. First Nat. Bank of Waterloo, 216 U.S ... 134, 138, 30 ... ...
  • Union Trust Co. of Maryland v. Townshend
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • February 23, 1939
    ...that might be asserted against him. Thompson v. Fairbanks, 196 U.S. 516, 526, 25 S.Ct. 306, 49 L.Ed. 577; Zartman v. First Nat. Bank, 216 U.S. 134, 138, 30 S.Ct. 368, 54 L.Ed. 418; Wiltshire v. Warburton, 4 Cir., 59 F.2d 611. Since the 1910 amendment to the Bankruptcy Act he has the rights ......
  • In re NJ Affordable Homes Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Jersey
    • November 8, 2013
    ...In re Chandler, 290 F. 988, 991 (E.D. Pa. 1923) (citing Security Warehousing Co. v. Hand, 206 U.S. 415 (1907); Zartman v. First Nat'l Bank of Waterloo, 216 U.S. 134 (1910); Thompson v. Fairbanks, 196 U.S. 516 (1905) (other citation omitted)). See generally Lafferty, 267 F.3d at 340. Because......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT