Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. Ratner
| Docket Number | S13G1723 |
| Decision Date | 11 July 2014 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
24 cases
-
Med. Ctr., Inc. v. Bowden
...steps in turn, and we look to decisions of the federal courts in interpreting OCGA § 9-11-23. Georgia–Pacific Consumer Products v. Ratner , 295 Ga. 524, 525 (1) n. 3, 762 S.E.2d 419 (2014).(a) Numerosity TMC argues that the Plaintiffs cannot meet the numerosity requirement because the numbe......
-
Sentinel Offender Svcs., LLC v. Glover
...issues. “Whether to certify a class is a matter committed to the discretion of the trial court.” Georgia–Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. Ratner, 295 Ga. 524, 526, 762 S.E.2d 419 (2014). On appellate review, this Court will respect the discretion of the trial judge in certifying or refusing......
-
Premier Paving GP, Inc. v. IOU Cent., Inc.
...court which would otherwise have jurisdiction over the appeal from a final order in the action."2 Ga.-Pac. Cons. Prods., LP v. Ratner , 295 Ga. 524, 526 (1), 762 S.E.2d 419 (2014) (citation omitted); see Glynn Cty. v. Coleman , 334 Ga. App. 559, 559, 779 S.E.2d 753 (2015) ("[O]n appellate r......
-
Bowden v. Medical Center, Inc.
...in the limited circumstances described in OCGA § 9-11-23." (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. Ratner , 295 Ga. 524, 525 (1), 762 S.E.2d 419 (2014). Thus, while the decision to certify a class is a matter committed to the discretion of the trial cour......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Trial Practice and Procedure
...S.E.2d at 656.37. Id.38. 331 Ga. App. 463, 771 S.E.2d 148 (2015).39. Id. at 467, 771 S.E.2d at 152.40. Id. at 468, 771 S.E.2d at 153.41. 295 Ga. 524, 762 S.E.2d 419 (2014). 42. O.C.G.A. § 9-11-23(a) (2015).43. 295 Ga. at 528, 763 S.E.2d at 423.44. Id. at 524, 762 S.E.2d at 420.45. Id. at 52......
-
The Great Escape: How One Plaintiffs Sidestep of a Mandatory Arbitration Clause Was Applied to a Class in Bickerstaff v. Suntrust Bank
...788 S.E.2d at 790-91. For a more detailed analysis of the operation of § 9-11-23, see Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products, LP v. Ratner, 295 Ga. 524, 762 S.E.2d 419 (2014). 13. Bickerstaff, 299 Ga. at 462, 788 S.E.2d at 790-91.14. Id. at 461, 788 S.E.2d at 790.15. See O.C.G.A § 9-11-23.16. FE......