Gerbige v. State
| Citation | 571 So.2d 401 |
| Decision Date | 12 October 1990 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 429 |
| Parties | Ronald R. GERBIGE v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Cecil M. Matthews, Guntersville, for appellant.
Don Siegelman, Atty. Gen., and Sandra Lewis, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT
Pursuant to Harris v. Reed, 489 U.S. 255 (1989), we hold that the appellant's claim that the State failed to produce sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction of receiving stolen property in the first degree is precluded under Temp. Rule 20.2(a)(3) and (5), A.R.Cr.P. Appellant's claim that his appellate counsel was ineffective because of a failure to file a brief on direct appeal is without merit, Ex parte Dunn, 514 So.2d 1300 (Ala.1987), because the appellant consented to his attorney's not filing a brief.
AFFIRMED.
All the Judges concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. McAdams
..."plain error" or "manifest injustice," even where the error was not brought to the attention of the trial court. See Gerbige v. State, 571 So.2d 401, 401 (Ala.Crim.App.1990); Aaron v. State, 300 Ark. 13, 14-15, 775 S.W.2d 894, 895 (1989), post-conviction relief denied, No. CR 89-58, 1991 WL......
- Bryant v. State, CR-89-403