German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Barnes

Decision Date17 June 1911
Docket Number8,868.
Citation189 F. 769
PartiesGERMAN ALLIANCE INS. CO. v. BARNES, Superintendent of Insurance of Kansas.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Kansas

Thomas Bates, Z. T. Hazen, and Seymour Edgerton, for complainant.

Fred S Jackson and Charles Blood Smith, for defendant.

POLLOCK District Judge.

This suit was instituted by complainant, an insurance corporation of the state of New York, engaged in transacting the business of fire insurance within the state by its permission and authority, to procure a decree perpetually enjoining and restraining defendant, as Superintendent of Insurance, from proceeding further under or in the enforcement of an act of the Legislature of the state entitled, 'An act relating to fire insurance and to provide for the regulation and control of rates of premium thereon, and to prevent discrimination therein, 'being chapter 152, Sess. Laws 1909, which said act took effect May 29, 1909, by which the Legislature assumed to regulate and limit the rates which should be charged for policies of fire insurance in all cases except where the policy is issued by a farmers' mutual insurance company, organized and doing business under the laws of this state, and insuring only farm property.

The question intended to be presented by the bill for decision is the constitutional validity of the act. Defendant has demurred to so much of the bill of complaint as challenges the validity of the act. The act reads as follows:

'Section 1. That every fire insurance company shall file with the Superintendent of Insurance general basis schedules showing the rates on all classes of risks insurable by such fire insurance company in this state, and all charges, credits, terms, privileges and conditions which in any wise affect such aforesaid rates or the value of the insurance issued to assured.
'Sec. 2. No change shall be made in the schedules which have been filed in compliance with the requirements of this act, except after ten days' notice to the Superintendent of Insurance, which notice shall plainly state the changes proposed to be made in the schedules then in force and the time when such changes will go into effect; and such changes shall be shown by filing new schedules, or shall be plainly indicated on the schedules in force at the time; provided, that the Superintendent' of Insurance may, in his discretion and for good cause shown, allow changes upon less than the notice specified herein, either in particular instances or by a general order applicable to special or peculiar circumstances or conditions.
'Sec. 3. When the Superintendent of Insurance shall determine that any rate made by an insurance company in this state is excessive or unreasonably high, or that said rate is not adequate to the safety or soundness of the company granting the same, he is authorized to direct said company to publish and file a higher or a lower rate, which shall be commensurate with the character of the risk, but in every case the rate shall be reasonable.
'Sec. 4. That no fire insurance company shall engage or participate in the insurance of any property located in this state unless the schedules of rates under which such property is insured has been filed in accordance with the provisions of this act; nor shall any fire insurance company write any insurance at a rate different than the rate named in its schedules, or refund or remit in any manner or by any device any portion of the rates so established, or extend to any insured or other person any privileges, advantage, favor, inducement or concession, except as is specified in such schedule.
'Sec. 5. Any fire insurance company entering into any contract of insurance on property located within this state for which no rate has been filed by such company as provided in section 1 of this act, shall within thirty days after entering into such contract, file with the Superintendent of Insurance in such form as may be required by him, a schedule of such property showing the rate thereon, and such information as may be required by such Superintendent of Insurance. Such schedule shall conform to the general basis schedule as provided in section 1, of this act, and when filed shall constitute the premium rate of such company for the described property.

'Sec. 6. That all schedules and local tariffs filed in accordance with the provisions of this act shall be open to the inspection of the public, and each local agent shall have and exhibit to the public copies thereof relative to all risks upon which he is authorized to write insurance.

'Sec. 7. That no fire insurance company shall directly or indirectly by any special rate, tariff, rebate, drawback or other device, charge, demand, collect or receive from any person or persons a greater or less or different compensation for the insurance of any property located in this state than it charges, demands, collects or receives from any other person or persons for like insurance or risks of a like kind and hazard under similar circumstances and conditions in this state; and any fire insurance company violating any of the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of unjust discrimination, which is hereby declared to be unlawful.

'Sec. 8. That the Superintendent of Insurance, if he shall find that any insurance company or any officer, agent or representative thereof, has violated any provisions of this act, may in his discretion, revoke the license of such offending company, officer or agent; but the revocation of any license as provided in this section shall in no manner affect the liability of such company, officer, agent or representative to the infliction of any other penalty hereinafter provided by any other section for violation of this act; and, provided, that any action, decision or determination of the Superintendent of Insurance under the provisions of this act shall be subject to review by the courts of this state as herein provided.

'Sec. 9. The Superintendent of Insurance shall not make any regulation or order without giving the insurance company concerned reasonable notice thereof, and an opportunity to appear and be heard in respect to the same, and if any insurance company or any other person, city or municipality which shall be interested in said order shall be dissatisfied with any regulation, order or rate adopted by said superintendent of insurance, said party or parties shall have the right within thirty days after the making of said regulation or order to bring an action against said superintendent of insurance in any district court of the state of Kansas to have such regulation or order vacated, and shall set forth in the petition the particular regulation or order complained of and the particular cause or causes of objection to any or all of them, and a summons shall be served upon the Superintendent of Insurance by delivering a copy thereof to his office at the state capitol, and such service may be had by the clerk delivering a certified copy of said summons by mail to the said superintendent of insurance at his office. Issues shall be formed and the controversy tried and determined as in other cases of a civil nature; and the court may set aside, vacate or annul one or more or any part of any of the regulations or orders adopted or fixed by the said superintendent of insurance which shall be by said court found to be unreasonable, unjust, excessive or inadequate to compensate the company writing insurance thereon for the risk assumed by it, without disturbing others. No injunction, interlocutory order or decree suspending or restraining the enforcement of an order of the Superintendent of Insurance shall be granted, provided; that the court may permit any company complaining under this act to write insurance at any rates which obtained prior to the ordering of the rate complained of, by the Superintendent of Insurance, upon condition that the difference between the rate complained of by the company and the rate at which it seeks to write insurance may be deposited with the superintendent of insurance, and on the final determination of the suit shall be paid by him to the insurance company, if the court shall find it entitled to the same, or to the holders of policies written by said company after the rate complained of was ordered by the Superintendent of Insurance, as the court may deem just and equitable. Whenever any action shall be brought by any insurance company under the provisions of this section within said period of thirty days, no penalties or forfeitures shall attach or accrue on account of the failure of the plaintiff to comply with the order sought to be vacated or modified in said action until the final determination of said suit. Either party to said cause, if dissatisfied with the judgment or decree of said court, may institute proceedings in error in the Supreme Court as in other civil cases, and said court shall examine the record, including the evidence, and render such judgment as shall be just and equitable, in the premises. No action shall be brought in any of the courts of the United States to set aside any order made by the Superintendent of Insurance under the provisions of this act before all of the remedies provided for herein shall have been exhausted by the party complaining. And if any company organized under the laws of this state, or authorized to transact the business of insurance in this state by the Superintendent of Insurance, shall violate this section, the Superintendent of Insurance may cancel the authority of said insurance company to transact business in this state.

'Sec 10. That any fire insurance company, or any director or officer thereof, or any agent or person acting for or employed by such company, who alone, or with any other...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State Ex Rel. Fulton v. Ives
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 16 de março de 1936
    ... ... Company v. Bows, 72 Fla. 17, 72 So. 278; Georgia ... Home Ins. Co. v. Hoskins, 71 Fla. 282, 71 So. 285; ... [167 So. 399] ... property without due process of law. German Alliance Ins ... Co. v. Barnes (C.C.) 189 F. 769; Lindsley v ... ...
  • Mississippi State Tax Commission v. Flora Drug Co
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • 22 de maio de 1933
    ... ... 37 C ... J. 201; 17 R. C. L. 518; Clarksdale Ins. Agency v ... Cole, 87 Miss. 637; Bank v. Worrell, 67 Miss ... 47, ... Co. v. Liebmann, 76 L.Ed. 479, 52 F.2d 349; German ... Alliance Ins. Co. v. Barnes, 189 F. 769; German ... Alliance Ins ... ...
  • State ex rel. Linde v. Taylor
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • 5 de fevereiro de 1916
    ... ... 571, 59 L.Ed ... 364, 35 S.Ct. 167, 7 N. C. C. A. 570; German Alliance ... Ins. Co. v. Lewis, 233 U.S. 389, 58 L.Ed. 1011, L.R.A ... In Tribune Printing & Binding Co. v. Barnes, 7 N.D. 591, 75 N.W. 904, this ... court sustained the validity of, and ... ...
  • Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. Welch
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 9 de novembro de 1915
    ...This question was presented to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas in the case of German Alliance Ins. Co. v. Barnes (C. C.) 189 F. 769. The Legislature of Kansas had passed a law conferring upon the Superintendent of Insurance of that state authority very simi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT