Germania Fire Ins. Co. v. Pitcher
Decision Date | 08 April 1903 |
Citation | 66 N.E. 1003,160 Ind. 392 |
Parties | GERMANIA FIRE INS. CO. v. PITCHER. |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Petition for rehearing.Denied.
For former opinion, see64 N. E. 921.
Appellant has filed a petition for a rehearing in this case.In the brief of counsel in support of the motion there seems to be no serious contention that the result was wrong, but exception is taken to the following sentence in the opinion: “If the assured regards his damage as amounting to a certain sum, and will not take less, while the company refuses to give that sum, it but remains to submit the contention to the courts.”The opinion had to do with a case where it prima facie appeared that the company had thrown the assured off her guard until it was too late to comply with the condition.The court did not have before it a case of a mere division of opinion between the parties that resulted in a refusal of the company to pay the amount demanded, where there was afterwards, and within the 60 days, negotiation that put the affair so far upon its original footing...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Supreme Council Catholic Benevolent Legion v. Grove
...166 Ind. 239, 76 N. E. 977, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 966, 117 Am. St. Rep. 382;Germania etc., Co. v. Pitcher, 160 Ind. 392, 64 N. E. 921, 66 N. E. 1003;American, etc., Co. v. Sweetster, 116 Ind. 370, 19 N. E. 159;Commercial Union Co. v. State, 113 Ind. 331, 15 N. E. 518. We perceive no objection ......
-
Bernhard v. Rochester German Ins. Co.
...40 N. W. 661; Boyd v. Cedar Rapids Ins. Co., 70 Iowa, 325, 30 N. W. 585; Germania Fire Ins. Co., v. Pitcher, 160 Ind. 392, 64 N. E. 921, 66 N. E. 1003; Siegle v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 107 Mo. App. 456, 81 S. W. 637. Color is lent to this position by the provisions of the present standard polici......
-
Mut. Trust & Deposit Co. v. Travelers' Protective Ass'n of America
...& Casualty Co. v. Sanders, 32 Ind. App. 448, 454, 70 N. E. 167;Germania Fire Ins. Co. v. Pitcher, 160 Ind 392, 398-402, 64 N. E. 921, 66 N. E. 1003. The paragraph was good for the same reasons that the amended paragraph was sufficient, viz.: The averment of compliance with the provisions as......
-
State Mut. Ins. Co. v. Green
...N.W. 769; Prussian Nat. Ins. Co. v. Peterson, 30 Ind. App. 289, 64 N.E. 102; Germania Fire Ins. Co. v. Pitcher, 160 Ind. 392, 64 N.E. 921, 66 N.E. 1003; Brock v. Des Moines Ins. Co., 106 Iowa 30, 75 N.W. 683; Minneapolis Fire & Marine Mut. Ins. Co. v. Fultz, 72 Ark. 365, 80 S.W. 576; Hanove......