Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton Home, No. 34869
| Court | Supreme Court of Illinois |
| Writing for the Court | HERSHEY; KLINGBIEL |
| Citation | 16 Ill.2d 556,158 N.E.2d 613 |
| Decision Date | 22 May 1959 |
| Docket Number | No. 34869 |
| Parties | Thomas Paul Fontaine GIACOPELLI et al., Appellees, v. FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME et al., Appellants. |
Page 613
v.
FLORENCE CRITTENTON HOME et al., Appellants.
[16 Ill.2d 557]
Page 614
Garretson, Lehmann & Thornquist, Chicago, Rudolph J. Westphal, Peoria (James L. Garretson, and Ruth Thornquist, Chicago, of counsel), for appellants.Ronan & Cunningham, Chicago, for appellees.
HERSHEY, Justice.
Nick and Helen Giacopelli, husband and wife, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the circuit court of [16 Ill.2d 558] Peoria County against Anthony and Doris Legaz, to secure the custody of petitioners' four-month-old son, Thomas Giacopelli. A return was filed alleging that petitioners had abandoned the child and were not fit to have its care and custody. The cause was tried by the court, which found that the welfare of the child would be best served by denying custody to petitioners. The writ was quashed, and the child was remanded to the custody of respondents. On review by the Appellate Court the order was reversed, with directions to return the child to petitioners. Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton Home, 16 Ill.App.2d 445, 148 N.E.2d 487. We have granted leave to appeal.
A determination of this cause requires a detailed analysis of the evidence adduced on the hearing in the trial court. Petitioners, Nick and Helen Giacopelli, were married March 10, 1955. At the time of the hearing in July, 1957, Nick Giacopelli was 38 years of age and Helen Giacopelli was 44 years of age. Nick Giacopelli had previously married three times, in 1943, 1944, and 1949. Each of these marriages ended in divorce, the first for the wife's fault and the other two for his fault. The second and third marriages were consummated at times when Nick Giacopelli was not yet divorced from his first wife, he not having secured a divorce from his first wife until 1950. By his third marriage he had one child who is now in the custody of the child's mother. Helen Giacopelli had been previously married once and divorced some 15 years ago. She had two children by the prior marriage. Her daughter is married and lives at Normal, Illinois, and her son is in the service. At present, petitioners are living in
Page 615
St. Louis, Missouri, in a 4-room apartment occupied by the mother of Nick Giacopelli.In May, 1956, Helen Fontaine Giacopelli became aware of the fact that she was pregnant. She claimed that she then became upset and emotionally disturbed and continued in this condition during the first 4 1/2 months of her pregnancy. [16 Ill.2d 559] The latter part of October she decided to visit her daughter at Normal. While driving to her daughter's home she became involved in a minor car accident. The woman driving the other car, whom she did not know, noticed her pregnancy, noticed that she was upset and, when told that she did not want to go home, suggested that she go to Florence Crittenton Home in Peoria. This home is a charitable organization providing a haven for unwed mothers. Pursuant to this suggestion she admits that she went to the Crittenton Home and there discussed her situation with Claire Austin, a trained social worker and executive director of the home. There are serious discrepancies in the testimony of Helen Fontaine Giacopelli and Claire Austin at this point. The first arises as to dates. Helen Fontaine Giacopelli testified that following the car accident in the latter part of October she proceeded to her daughter's home, left her car there and took a bus back to her husband's home in St. Louis. She says that on November 5 she took a bus to Peoria and entered the Crittenton Home; that she was interviewed by Claire Austin the next day, November 6; and that she remained in the home until November 15 when she decided to leave, until closer to the time of her delivery. Claire Austin testified that Helen Fontaine Giacopelli telephoned the home a day or two prior to October 21 to inquire about the facilities and that on October 21 she entered the home for the first time. On that day she interviewed Helen Fontaine Giacopelli and prepared an intake sheet which she produced in court and which apparently bore the date of October 21. On that date, in preparation for her entrance into the home, a Wassermann and smear were taken of Helen Fontaine Giacopelli and sent to the Health Department. Report cards showing negative as to both were returned to the Crittenton Home and these cards are dated October 22. These cards were likewise produced in open court. Claire Austin further testified that Helen Fontaine Giacopelli remained in [16 Ill.2d 560] the home until November 4, and not November 15, when she announced that she would go to her daughter's home and there wait until she was closer to the time of delivery. The record is barren of any explanation by Helen Fontaine Giacopelli of these discrepancies as to dates.
The second major discrepancy appears with reference to the interview between Helen Fontaine Giacopelli and Claire Austin upon her first entrance to Crittenton Home. On direct examination Helen Fontaine Giacopelli testified that she told Claire Austin about her emotional reactions; that Claire Austin advised her she was in the right place; that it wasn't necessary to give her right name or address and that an Illinois address would be more convenient; that she should not reveal her identity to anyone and, if asked, she was to say she was unmarried and wanted to give her baby up. She further testified that she told Claire Austin to contact a Vito Palazolla if anything happened to her and he would contact her husband. On cross-examination she said she told Claire Austin all about herself, that she had a son and daughter, that she gave her daughter's address in Normal, Illinois, as her address, although she told her she actually lived in St. Louis; that she told Claire Austin she was Catholic and her husband's name was Nick Giacopelli; that she did not name Vito Palazolla as the father of her unborn child. Helen Fontaine Giacopelli finally admitted, however, that upon entering the Crittenton Home she gave her name as Helen Fontaine and that she did not at any time change this designation. She also admitted she represented that she was an unmarried woman.
Page 616
Claire Austin produced in open court the intake record sheet made up by her at the time of the interview. The material contained on it was derived from the question and answer interview with Helen Fontaine Giocapelli. Claire Austin testified that Helen Fontaine Giacopelli told her she was illegitimately pregnant; that one Vito Palazolla was [16 Ill.2d 561] the father of the child; that they had been contemplating marriage but that she had become convinced that Vito was no longer interested; that she wanted to keep the situation from the general public because of her shame and wanted to place the baby for adoption; that she gave the name of the paternal grandmother as Rose Palazolla who lived in St. Louis; that she was of the Protestant faith-a Baptist-and had been referred to the home by a minister. Claire Austin testified that she particularly questioned her about her religion since it appeared odd to her that, with the French name of Fontaine, she would be of the Protestant faith.
Helen Fontaine Giacopelli testified that she left the Crittenton Home the forepart of November and went to her husband's home in St. Louis. She did not disclose to him the fact that she had been to the Crittenton Home or that she intended to return. She did return on January 12. The baby was born on March 2 at the Methodist Hospital in Peoria and Helen Fontaine Giacopelli gave it the name of Thomas Paul Fontaine. She returned from the hospital on March 4 and continued to stay at the home until March 23.
The evidence further shows that on March 5 Helen Fontaine Giacopelli called for Claire Austin and requested that papers for adoption be prepared so that the baby could be placed as soon as possible. Pursuant to the request, Claire Austin prepared an appearance and consent to a finding of dependency and consent to appointment of a guardian for the child with power to consent to adoption without further notice. This Helen Fontaine Giacopelli read and then...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Doe v. Mitchell, No. 1
...of the child that he be placed in the custody of someone other than the natural parent. See Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton Home, 16 Ill.2d 556, 158 N.W.2d 613 (1959); 67 C.J.S. Parent and Child § 11; 27 Am.Jur., Infants § 108; and also see Halstead v. Halstead, 259 Iowa 526, 144 N.W.2d T......
-
Petition of Kirchner, No. 78101
...any other person" and a best-interests hearing would thus be improper. The Does also cite Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton Home (1959), 16 Ill.2d 556, 158 N.E.2d 613, for the proposition that Otto must participate in a best-interests hearing and, thus, that a father can be divested of his ......
-
J.M., In re, No. 2-87-0418
...of Massachusetts[170 Ill.App.3d 562] (1944), 321 U.S. 158, 64 S.Ct. 438, 88 L.Ed. 645; Giacopelli v. The Florence Crittenton Home (1959), 16 Ill.2d 556, 158 N.E.2d 613.) Thus, contrary to respondent's assertion above, the State may interfere in a parent's fundamental right to the custody of......
-
Halstead v. Halstead, No. 52129
...v. Highsmith, 152 Fla. 837, 13 So.2d 208; Altmiller v. Forsman, 76 Idaho 521, 285 P.2d 1064; Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton Home, 16 Ill.2d 556, 158 N.E.2d 613; Glass v. Bailey, 233 Ind. 266, 118 N.E.2d 800; State ex rel. Paul v. Peniston, 235 La. 579, 105 So.2d 228; Thumma v. Hartsook, ......
-
Doe v. Mitchell, No. 1
...of the child that he be placed in the custody of someone other than the natural parent. See Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton Home, 16 Ill.2d 556, 158 N.W.2d 613 (1959); 67 C.J.S. Parent and Child § 11; 27 Am.Jur., Infants § 108; and also see Halstead v. Halstead, 259 Iowa 526, 144 N.W.2d T......
-
Petition of Kirchner, No. 78101
...any other person" and a best-interests hearing would thus be improper. The Does also cite Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton Home (1959), 16 Ill.2d 556, 158 N.E.2d 613, for the proposition that Otto must participate in a best-interests hearing and, thus, that a father can be divested of his ......
-
J.M., In re, No. 2-87-0418
...of Massachusetts[170 Ill.App.3d 562] (1944), 321 U.S. 158, 64 S.Ct. 438, 88 L.Ed. 645; Giacopelli v. The Florence Crittenton Home (1959), 16 Ill.2d 556, 158 N.E.2d 613.) Thus, contrary to respondent's assertion above, the State may interfere in a parent's fundamental right to the custody of......
-
Halstead v. Halstead, No. 52129
...v. Highsmith, 152 Fla. 837, 13 So.2d 208; Altmiller v. Forsman, 76 Idaho 521, 285 P.2d 1064; Giacopelli v. Florence Crittenton Home, 16 Ill.2d 556, 158 N.E.2d 613; Glass v. Bailey, 233 Ind. 266, 118 N.E.2d 800; State ex rel. Paul v. Peniston, 235 La. 579, 105 So.2d 228; Thumma v. Hartsook, ......