Gibbons v. Dunn

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtMARSTON, C.J.
CitationGibbons v. Dunn, 46 Mich. 146, 9 N. W. 140 (Mich. 1881)
Decision Date08 June 1881
PartiesGIBBONS v. DUNN.

On a bill to set aside a deed for the grantor's incompetency the burden of proving incompetency is upon the complainant whose case fails if the evidence is so evenly balanced as to leave the question in doubt.

Appeal from Wayne. Defendant appeals.

Moore & Moore and Chas. M. Swift, for complainant.

Griffin & Dickinson, for defendant.

MARSTON C.J.

The complainant seeks to have a deed executed by her father in 1869 to the defendant set aside because of the incompetency of the grantor at the time of executing the instrument.

In 1874 complainant's father conveyed a certain other description of land to another son, William Dunn, and the same year a third piece of land to his son Michael Dunn. Separate bills were filed against each of these parties to have these deeds set aside and for the same reason, and in each case a decree was rendered in favor of complainant, from which appeals were taken by the defendant in each case.

The cases were heard together upon pleadings and proofs. A large number of witnesses were examined in favor of the complaint and the evidence given by them tended very strongly to show that the grantor, now deceased, was at the time of executing the conveyance in question incompetent and not capable of doing any business. On the part and behalf of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Grebe v. Swords
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • October 1, 1914
    ... ... invalidate it or avoid it. Rev. Codes 1905, § 5326; ... Bray v. Comer, 82 Ala. 183, 1 So. 81; Gibbons v ... Dunn, 46 Mich. 147, 9 N.W. 140; Jackson v ... Wood, 88 Mo. 76; Roberts v. Derby, 68 Hun, 299, ... 23 N.Y.S. 34; Atlantic Delaine Co ... ...
  • Chadwell v. Reed
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 19, 1906
    ...7 Ga. 484; Howe v. Howe, 99 Mass. 88; Brown v. Brown, 39 Mich. 792; Chancellor v. Donnell, 95 Ala. 342, 10 South. 910; Gibbons v. Dunn, 46 Mich. 146, 9 N. W. 140; Kimball v. Cuddy, 117 Ill. 213, 7 N. E. 589; Buckey v. Buckey, 38 W. Va. 168, 18 S. E. 383; Anderson v. Cranmer, 11 W. Va. 562; ......
  • Munn v. Haynes
    • United States
    • Michigan Supreme Court
    • June 8, 1881
  • Gross v. Jones
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • February 4, 1907
    ...and Pratt & Reed, for appellants and cross-appellees. Counsel cited the following authorities: 1 Wigmore on Evidence, sec. 228; Gibbons v. Dunn, 46 Mich. 146; Cropp Cropp, 88 Va., 753; State v. Scott, 36 L. R. A., 721; 3 Wigmore on Evidence, 1671; Hughes v. Jones, 116 N.Y. 67 (s.c., 15 Am. ......