Gibbs v. State

Decision Date09 May 1967
Docket Number2 Div. 138
Citation44 Ala.App. 15,200 So.2d 518
PartiesJohnny B. GIBBS v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Lester F. Williamson, Meridian, Miss., for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

JOHNSON, Judge.

Appellant was indicted by the Grand Jury of Marengo County, Alabama, for the offense of manslaughter in the first degree. After a plea of not guilty, appellant was convicted and sentenced to a term of ten years imprisonment for this offense. This is an appeal from said verdict and judgment.

The tendency of the evidence shows that appellant was involved in an accident on October 7, 1965, which occurred when a car pulling a mobile home two vehicles ahead of appellant had a flat tire and stopped at the right side of the highway. A large van immediately behind the mobile home and just ahead of appellant's pulpwood truck came to an abrupt halt. Appellant testified that the brakes failed to hold and that he swung his truck to the left and around the van. There was a bridge abutment to the right. Appellant's truck struck a car 'headon' traveling in the opposite direction. Six of the seven occupants of the car died. Another pulpwood truck behind appellant then struck appellant from behind, driving his truck and the car down 'a fill'.

Witnesses for the State testified that the car of the deceaseds was traveling at about 55 miles per hour; that deceaseds were headed home from their jobs at Marengo Mills; and that appellant's truck was traveling at about 60 miles per hour. Witnesses also stated that the car of the deceaseds 'bounced' and swerved to the left while braking to try to avoid appellant's truck. Skid marks were noted from the car but none were noted from the truck.

The owner of the truck which appellant was driving testified that the brakes had been relined a week before the accident.

Counsel for appellant at the trial were a Mississippi attorney and an Alabama attorney associated with him. The Mississippi attorney was present at appellant's arraignment and assisted in his posting bond. Upon being informed that he was to be accepted as attorney of record for the trial of this case, he attempted to withdraw but was not permitted to do so by the court.

On February 5, 1965, appellant's counsel, Mr. Williamson of Mississippi, filed the following motions: (A) Motion for continuance on grounds he was a Mississippi attorney not schooled in Alabama legal procedure; (B) Demurrer; (C) Motion to quash the indictment on grounds that statement of appellant was taken without his counsel, Grand Jury not constitutionally impanelled, and because of systematic exclusion of Negroes from the Grand Jury; (D) Motion to have drawn in open court a special venire of jurors to try said case; (E) Renewal of motion to quash, citing a February 7, 1966, decision by a three judge Federal panel which ruled Alabama jurors were selected unconstitutionally as there were no women jurors (filed February 10, 1966); and (F) Motion to require the jury commission of Marengo County to draw a new jury list prior to trial of defendant, citing again the Federal decision of February 7, 1966, concerning racial prejudice on juries in Alabama (filed February 10, 1966).

A hearing on the motions was held at which time counsel for appellant attempted to prove the substance of his motions by examination of the court clerk, the court house and all records being destroyed by fire in the last half of the year.

The State then filed a motion to strike appellant's motion to quash the indictment and motion for selection of special venire in open court as being untimely filed. Said motion was granted by the court.

In the opinion of this court the striking of appellant's motions as untimely because it was filed after a plea to the merits of not guilty, was error.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Williams v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • August 31, 1976
    ...Certainly this is the established Alabama procedure in the face of a constitutional claim of systematic exclusion. Gibbs v. State, 44 Ala.App. 15, 200 So.2d 518; Stallworth v. State, 45 Ala.App. 254, 229 So.2d 26; Washington v. State, 46 Ala.App. 539, 245 So.2d Thomas v. State, 277 Ala. 570......
  • Williamson v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • May 21, 1974
    ...was the proper procedural vehicle to raise the question of systematic exclusion of Negroes from grand and petty juries. Gibbs v. State, 44 Ala.App. 15, 200 So.2d 518. Nonetheless, no dispensation of the requirement for such a motion to be written has been called to our attention. We recogni......
  • Washington v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • January 12, 1971
    ...States have been violated. * * *.' From Thomas, supra; Coleman v. Alabama, 377 U.S. 129, 84 S.Ct. 1152, 12 L.Ed.2d 190; Gibbs v. State, 44 Ala.App. 15, 200 So.2d 518; and Stallworth v. State, 45 Ala.App. 254, 229 So.2d 26, it is obvious that the question of systematic exclusion remains viab......
  • Gibbs v. State, 2 Div. 5
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 16, 1970
    ...Gallion, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State. CATES, Judge. This is the second appeal. See Gibbs v. State, 44 Ala.App. 15, 200 So.2d 518. I The grand jury, April 24, 1968, reindicted Gibbs for voluntary manslaughter. Code 1940, T. 14, § 320. He moved to quash bot......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT