Gibbs v. State, 570S115

Decision Date27 September 1971
Docket NumberNo. 570S115,570S115
Citation257 Ind. 187,273 N.E.2d 280
PartiesThomas GIBBS, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

J. Bayne Burton, Anderson, for appellant.

Theodore L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., J. Frank Hanley, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ARTERBURN, Chief Justice. *

On July 16, 1969, appellant was charged, by affidavit, with the crime of First Degree Burglary. On August 12, 1969, appellant and his appointed counsel appeared before the court and entered a plea of not guilty to the charge of first degree burglary. On January 6, 1970, after a lengthy continuance, appellant and counsel appeared before the court for a trial by jury. On the same day, appellant filed a Motion for Change of Venue from Madison County. The motion, omitting heading and more formal parts, reads as follows:

'1. That the undersigned is the defendant in the above captioned cause and that he verily believes he cannot receive a fair and impartial trial of said cause in the County of Madison, owing to the excitement and prejudice against the defendant in said County.'

'2. Affiant further says that he could not make this affidavit for Change of Venue sooner or within the time fixed by law and the rules of court for the reason that he believed said excitement and prejudice had ceased to exist but that he was now learned that said excitement and prejudice does still exist and that he makes this affidavit in accordance with the laws of the State of Indiana.'

'Wherefore, the defendant prays the court that this motion for Change of Venue from Madison County be granted.'

The State objected to the Change of Venue and evidence on the motion was heard. At the conclusion of the evidence the court overruled the motion.

Trial by jury was held and appellant found guilty of first degree burglary and sentenced by the court to not less than ten (10) years nor more than twenty (20) years in the Indiana State Reformatory.

Appellant's sole contention is that the overruling of his Motion for Change of Venue was an abuse of the trial court's discretion as contended by appellant in his Motion to Correct Errors which was also overruled by the trial court.

Trial Rule 77 of the Indiana Rules of Procedure (Effective January 1, 1970) which was in effect at the time appellant filed his motion, is now contained in exactly the same form in Criminal Rule 12 of the Indiana Rules of Criminal Procedure. This rule provides that:

'In all cases where the venue of a criminal action may now be changed from the judge, such change shall be granted upon the execution and filing of an unverified application therefor by the state of Indiana or by the defendant. Upon the filing of a properly verified application, a change of venue from the county shall be granted in all cases punishable by death and may be granted in all other cases when in the court's discretion cause for such change is shown to exist after such hearing or upon such other proof as the court may require. Provided, however, that the state of Indiana or the defendant shall be entitled to only one (1) change from the judge and the defendant shall be entitled to only one (1) change from the county.'

'In any criminal action, no change of judge or change of venue from the county shall be granted except within the time herein provided.'

'An application for a change of judge or change of venue from the county shall be filed within ten (10) days after a plea of not guilty, or if a date less than ten (10) days from the date of said plea, the case is set for trial, the application shall be filed within five (5) days after setting the case for trial. Provided, that where a cause is remanded for a new trial by the Supreme Court, such application must be filed not later than ten (10) days...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • McFarland v. State
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 13 November 1975
    ...a motion for change of venue in a case such as this is reviewed only for abuse of trial court discretion. Rule CR. 12; Gibbs v. State, (1971) 257 Ind. 187, 273 N.E.2d 280. We can find no such abuse II. The Appellant's next allegation of error concerns the admission into evidence of color ph......
  • Nelson v. State, 471S93
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 25 September 1972
    ...in his application any of the specific information required by the rule in instances of belated filing. In the case of Gibbs v. State (1971), Ind., 273 N.E.2d 280, this Court was confronted with a nearly identical situation. As in the case at bar, the appellant there failed to set out the i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT